The accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for musculoskeletal soft tissue pathology of the extremities: a comprehensive review of the literature

Abstract

Musculoskeletal diagnostic ultrasound imaging (MSK-DUSI) has been growing outside the traditional radiology speciality. Increased use of this technology has been reported in several healthcare settings, however an apparent gap in the knowledge of the accuracy of this diagnostic technology indicated a review was warranted. We undertook a structured review of the literature to assess the accuracy of MSK-DUSI for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal soft tissue pathology of the extremities. An electronic search of the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed database (1972 to mid-2014) was conducted. All relevant systematic reviews of diagnostic studies, all diagnostic studies published after the date of the latest systematic reviews and relevant diagnostic studies outside the scope the systematic reviews that directly compared the accuracy of MSK-DUSI (the index test) to an appropriate reference standard for the target condition were included. A fundamental appraisal of the methodological quality of studies was completed. The individual sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio data were extracted and entered into diagnostic accuracy tables. A total of 207 individual studies were included. The results show that MSK-DUSI has acceptable diagnostic accuracy for a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions of the extremities. However, there is a lack of high quality prospective experimental studies in this area and as such clinicians should interpret the results with some caution due to the potential for overestimation of diagnostic accuracy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12998-015-0076-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Injuries with Findings from Diagnostic Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Canines – 43 Cases

“…It was later reported that the use of ultrasonography is reliable in diagnosing partial ruptures of Achilles tendon with a sensitivity of 0.94, a specificity of 1.00, and an overall accuracy of 0.95 (Kälebo et al, 1992). More recent studies in humans suggest that musculoskeletal ultrasound has moderate to high diagnostic values in elucidation of Achilles tendinopathy (Henderson et al, 2015). Such data are not yet available in veterinary medicine.…”

“…Degenerative injuries may also be secondary to other causes such as systemic disease (Spinella et al, 2010) Ultrasound evaluation has become a valuable and practical tool in assessing the Achilles tendon. It is used frequently in human medicine for diagnostic evaluation and grading of Achilles tendon injuries (Griffith, 2014;Luscombe et al, 2003;Henderson et al, 2015;Royall, 2011;Maffulli et al, 2004). Another advantage of musculoskeletal ultrasound is the possibility to use the contralateral limb as a comparison to evaluate symmetry of the tendon.…”

Similarities and differences of a selection of key accreditation standards between chiropractic councils on education: a systematic review

“…It is expected that this core or common body of knowledge would change over time. For example, it is possible that there will be an increasing emphasis on MRI and ultrasound imaging modalities [49, 50]. …”

An “alternative finger” in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: intraoperative ultrasound localization of pulmonary nodules

“…A CT value of -100 HU is considered a typical clinical soft tissue value [28]. Pulmonary nodules with CT values exceeding this value are generally considered to be solid pulmonary nodules (SPN), which are not difficult to find intraoperatively.…”