2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind

Abstract: To test young children’s false belief theory of mind in a morally relevant context, two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, children (N = 162) at 3.5, 5.5, and 7.5 years of age were administered 3 tasks: prototypic moral transgression task, false belief theory of mind task (ToM), and an “accidental transgressor” task, which measured a morally relevant false belief theory of mind (MoToM). Children who did not pass false belief ToM were more likely to attribute negative intentions to an accidental trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
388
9
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(74 reference statements)
29
388
9
15
Order By: Relevance
“…These emotions developmentally presuppose at least a basic understanding of the other's mind and understanding about why it is wrong to break moral norms of fairness, justice, and care (Malti & Ongley, 2013;Malti & Keller, 2010). Research has Developmental Perspective 6 provided evidence for the role of morally relevant thought in making moral judgments (e.g., the intentions of an actor; Leslie, Knobe, & Cohen, 2006;Killen, Mulvey, Richardson, Jampol, & Woodward, 2011). Furthermore, neuroscience research has documented that emotion and cognition are inherently connected in moral situations in the brain (Blair & Fowler, 2008;Decety, Michalska, & Kinzler, 2012).…”
Section: What Are Moral Emotions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These emotions developmentally presuppose at least a basic understanding of the other's mind and understanding about why it is wrong to break moral norms of fairness, justice, and care (Malti & Ongley, 2013;Malti & Keller, 2010). Research has Developmental Perspective 6 provided evidence for the role of morally relevant thought in making moral judgments (e.g., the intentions of an actor; Leslie, Knobe, & Cohen, 2006;Killen, Mulvey, Richardson, Jampol, & Woodward, 2011). Furthermore, neuroscience research has documented that emotion and cognition are inherently connected in moral situations in the brain (Blair & Fowler, 2008;Decety, Michalska, & Kinzler, 2012).…”
Section: What Are Moral Emotions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that children of this age reliably use information about intentions when judging whether an actor is blameworthy for a harmful action (Cushman et al 2013;Killen et al 2011; Leslie et al 2006), it is plausible 1 that these divergent moral judgments are driven by divergent intention attributions. Thus, in both of these studies, knowledge of an actor's race seems to bias participants' mental-state attributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, children who have not passed the test of false beliefs are more likely to punish someone who is accidentally wrong (Killen et al, 2011). The authors have created such a research indicator in the field: morally-relevant false belief theory of mind (Motomit).…”
Section: The Link Between Theory Of Mind and Ethics; Some Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%