2009
DOI: 10.1029/2006jf000740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thaw lake expansion in a two‐dimensional coupled model of heat transfer, thaw subsidence, and mass movement

Abstract: [1] Thaw lakes, widespread in permafrost lowlands, expand their basins by conduction of heat from warm lake water into adjacent permafrost, subsidence of icy permafrost on thawing, and movement of thawed sediment from lake margins into basins by diffusive and advective mass wasting. We describe a cross-sectional numerical model with thermal processes and mass wasting. To test the model and provide an initial investigation of its utility, the model is driven using historical daily temperatures and permafrost co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(140 reference statements)
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, small water bodies and lakes can strongly modify the ground thermal regime both in the underlying ground and in the surrounding land areas Langer et al, 2015), so the model results are questionable in areas with a high fraction of open water areas (Muster et al, 2012). While more sophisticated model schemes (Plug and West, 2009;Westermann et al, 2016) can simulate the ground thermal regime of such features, a spatially distributed application is challenging: in general, higher-complexity models require additional input data and model parameter sets (e.g., precipitation for a water balance model, Endrizzi et al, 2014), for which the spatial and temporal distributions are poorly known. Furthermore, the model sensitivity may vary in space depending on the interplay of different model parameters and input data (Gubler et al, 2013), which makes it harder to judge the uncertainty of model results.…”
Section: The Cryogrid 2 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, small water bodies and lakes can strongly modify the ground thermal regime both in the underlying ground and in the surrounding land areas Langer et al, 2015), so the model results are questionable in areas with a high fraction of open water areas (Muster et al, 2012). While more sophisticated model schemes (Plug and West, 2009;Westermann et al, 2016) can simulate the ground thermal regime of such features, a spatially distributed application is challenging: in general, higher-complexity models require additional input data and model parameter sets (e.g., precipitation for a water balance model, Endrizzi et al, 2014), for which the spatial and temporal distributions are poorly known. Furthermore, the model sensitivity may vary in space depending on the interplay of different model parameters and input data (Gubler et al, 2013), which makes it harder to judge the uncertainty of model results.…”
Section: The Cryogrid 2 Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatially distributed permafrost modeling was, for example, demonstrated by Zhang et al (2013) and Westermann et al (2013), forced by interpolations of meteorological measurements, or by Jafarov et al (2012) and Fiddes et al (2015) by downscaled atmospheric model data. Remote-sensing data sets have been extensively used to indirectly infer the ground thermal state through surface observations, e.g., occurrence and evolution of thermokarst features (e.g., Jones et al, 2011), vegetation types characteristic for permafrost (Panda et al, 2014) or change detection of spectral indices (Nitze and Grosse, 2016). As permafrost is a subsurface temperature phenomenon, it is not possible to observe it directly from satellite-borne sensors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also promising are recent efforts to consider enhanced melting of massive ground ice by flowing water [Marsh and Neumann, 2001]. Other efforts to estimate the loss of soil volume due to ground ice melting and the resulting failure of lake shores [Plug and West, 2009] are also yielding interesting results. Such efforts offer possible ways that feedbacks associated with lake expansion or drainage can be incorporated into larger models.…”
Section: Current Efforts To Understand Arctic Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…11), but since the DOS-TEM is a one-dimensional model it is unable to simulate lateral heat exchange. A two-or three-dimensional model would be better able to simulate the thermal processes in complex Arctic tundra landscapes (e.g., Ling and Zhang, 2003;Plug and West, 2009;van Huissteden et al, 2011;Kessler et al, 2012), but such models are difficult to apply over large regions.…”
Section: Limitations and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, however, such information is not readily available at present. A new technology known as surface nuclear magnetic resonance has recently been used over thermokarst lakes to measure the underlying talik thickness (Parsekian et al, 2013) and promises to provide useful information on talik that can be used to improve modeling in future studies.…”
Section: Limitations and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%