TH variation in Hong Kong English

Abstract

The current study examines patterns of TH variation in Hong Kong English (HKE). In particular, it examines patterns in the realization of the voiceless interdental fricative /θ/ as the voiceless labiodental fricative [f],2 a process known as TH-fronting, as well as realization of the voiceless of TH as [s]. Previous research on HKE (Bolton & Kwok 1990; Hung 2000; Deterding et al.2008; Setter et al.2010) has established that TH-fronting is a variable phenomenon in HKE, with both intra- and inter-speaker variation, though no research to date has examined the social and linguistic constraints that govern this phenomenon in HKE. The current study also examines the realization of TH as [s], which has not been documented in previous research on HKE, but was found to be a variant of TH in the current study. This article thus examines the social (defined here as non-linguistic constraints such as gender, medium of instruction and proficiency) and linguistic (syllable position, linguistic environment, stress) factors which impact the realization of TH in HKE and whether these factors differ for the realization of TH as [f] or [s].

The Holistic Advantage: Unified Quantitative Modeling for Less-Biased, In-Depth Insights into (Socio)Linguistic Variation

“…This limited scope can create the illusion that only social, diachronic, and stylistic factors influence internal variation in EngPH when, in reality, the situation can be more intricate. It is known, for example, in sociolinguistic research, that linguistic factors can be more robust predictors of sociolinguistic variation than social factors (Gonzales 2023b(Gonzales , 2024Grafmiller et al 2018;Hansen Edwards 2018). For instance, in Gonzales' work on Lánnang-uè affixes, the influence of affix type and affix language had relatively higher impact on grammaticality judgments compared to social factors like attitudes and age.…”

Teachers’ Feedback on a New Variety of English: The Case of Hong Kong English

“…Extensive research has been performed on HKE, in terms of its phonological inventories (e.g. Hansen Edwards, 2016Edwards, , 2018Hung, 2000;Lam, 2017), language attitudes (e.g. Chan, 2016Chan, /2017Hansen Edwards, 2015, 2016Zhang, 2014), sociolinguistic features (e.g.…”