2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TFGAN: Traffic forecasting using generative adversarial network with multi-graph convolutional network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper proposes an asymmetric semantic segmentation model APFCN in view of the low accuracy of traditional semantic segmentation models for images with inconsistent backgrounds. APFCN uses the five layer hole convolution network [11,12] to extract image contour features on the upper path, the convolution core and hole rate of the five layer hole convolution network [13] are designed according to NHDC strategy, and the multi-scale details of the image are extracted through the convolution and pooling network on the lower path. Finally, the image semantic segmentation accuracy is improved by fusing the two types of features.…”
Section: Construction Of Asymmetric Semantic Segmentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposes an asymmetric semantic segmentation model APFCN in view of the low accuracy of traditional semantic segmentation models for images with inconsistent backgrounds. APFCN uses the five layer hole convolution network [11,12] to extract image contour features on the upper path, the convolution core and hole rate of the five layer hole convolution network [13] are designed according to NHDC strategy, and the multi-scale details of the image are extracted through the convolution and pooling network on the lower path. Finally, the image semantic segmentation accuracy is improved by fusing the two types of features.…”
Section: Construction Of Asymmetric Semantic Segmentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an unsupervised learning framework that is widely applicable, but its overall performance needs to be improved. The STGNN can consider both spatial and temporal dependence and can handle highly nonlinear and complex problems [42]. Meanwhile, the complexity of the model is high, and its application in time series needs improvements.…”
Section: B Representation-learning-based Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An STGCN consists of a graph convolution in the spatial dimension and a one-dimensional standard convolution in the temporal dimension, which capture the hidden spatial features of neighborhood locations and the complex temporal dependencies at different times, respectively. Inspired by the above studies, by combining the spatial heterogeneity, dynamic correlations, and uncertainty of road traffic networks, as well as the non-Euclidean data [31] characteristics of traffic flows, a traffic flow prediction model called IDG-PSAtt is proposed. The combination of an interactive dynamic convolution structure with spatialtemporal convolution and a ProbSSAtt block fully captures the dynamic spatial-temporal features of the input traffic flow time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the above studies, by combining the spatial heterogeneity, dynamic correlations, and uncertainty of road traffic networks, as well as the non-Euclidean data [31] characteristics of traffic flows, a traffic flow prediction model called IDG-PSAtt is proposed. The combination of an interactive dynamic convolution structure with spatial-temporal convolution and a ProbSSAtt block fully captures the dynamic spatial-temporal features of the input traffic flow time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%