2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icacci.2015.7275819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Text normalization of code mix and sentiment analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the opinion classifier on the er tweets was found to be 65.7%, 7% lower than our system. We also compared our mr sentiment classifier with that of Sharma et al (2015b). As their method performs two class sentiment detection (+ and −), we select such tweets from SAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy of the opinion classifier on the er tweets was found to be 65.7%, 7% lower than our system. We also compared our mr sentiment classifier with that of Sharma et al (2015b). As their method performs two class sentiment detection (+ and −), we select such tweets from SAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been a couple of studies on sentiment detection of code-switched tweets (Vilares et al, 2015;Sharma et al, 2015b). Sharma et al (2015b) use Hindi SentiWordNet and normalization techniques to detect sentiment in Hi-En CS tweets.…”
Section: Opinion and Sentiment Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Work has also been done to support word level identification of languages in code-mixed text (Chittaranjan et al, 2014). Sharma et al (2015) tried an approach based on lexicon lookup for text normalization and sentiment analysis of code-mixed data. Pravalika et al (2017) used a lexicon lookup approach to perform domain specific sentiment analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pandey and Sharvari [27] applied HSWN along with negation discourse for sentiment analysis of Hindi language text corpora, with the accuracy of near 80%. Srinivas, Sharma and Balbantray [28] demonstrated that text normalization can be achieved using techniques such phonetics based, slang and spelling correction approaches in another limited work [29] they demonstrated application of sentiment analysis techniques on transliterated text by using bilingual dictionary methods and HSWN for sentiment score calculation with 80% accuracy being achieved. Marathi and Sanskrit word identification was achieved by another work by Kulkarni, Patil and Dhanokar [30] using the genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Balamurali and Joshimentioning
confidence: 99%