2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11250-8_92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the Initial–Final Mass Relationship of White Dwarfs

Abstract: A mis padres y hermana AgraïmentsEn primer lloc vull agrair als meus directors de tesi, Jordi Isern i Enrique García-Berro, que em donessin l'oportunitat de realitzar el doctorat a l'IEEC (al CSIC i a la UPC), així com que em proporcionessin tot el suport necessari. Crec que he après moltes coses importants en aquestsúltims anys, no només en la part científica, i això en partés una conseqüència d'haver treballat amb ells. Els vull donar les gràcies també pel suport i la confiança dipositada en mi, especialment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
184
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(346 reference statements)
5
184
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen a value of Z = 0.027 taken from Catalán et al (2008a) but our mass and age determinations do only weakly depend on the choice of metallicity: If we instead use the lowest recent value for the metallicity of Praesepe (Z = 0.019, Claver et al 2001;Casewell et al 2009) the progenitor age becomes only 1% longer, which implies the progenitor mass estimates would be 0.03 M smaller, consistent with the estimates from Casewell et al (2009).…”
Section: Wd 0836+201mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have chosen a value of Z = 0.027 taken from Catalán et al (2008a) but our mass and age determinations do only weakly depend on the choice of metallicity: If we instead use the lowest recent value for the metallicity of Praesepe (Z = 0.019, Claver et al 2001;Casewell et al 2009) the progenitor age becomes only 1% longer, which implies the progenitor mass estimates would be 0.03 M smaller, consistent with the estimates from Casewell et al (2009).…”
Section: Wd 0836+201mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Using their values, Catalán et al (2008a) re-estimated the mass and the progenitor mass of this object to discuss the effect of the magnetic field on IFMR. Casewell et al (2009) mentioned that the analysis with non-magnetic model spectra may lead to uncertainties in the temperature determination.…”
Section: Wd 0836+201mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 shows that for a stellar mass equal to the minimum mass considered presently, a 10 M Jup mass planet with an orbital radius >2.5 AU should escape engulfment by the parent star. For a ∼1.5 M star (equivalent to a white dwarf of 0.57 M according to Catalán et al 2008) this limit is ∼3.5 AU.…”
Section: Evolutionary Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial-to-final mass relation can also be studied using white dwarfs in wide binaries (i.e. main-sequence star plus white dwarf; Catalán et al 2008a; or two white dwarfs; Girven et al 2010;Andrews et al 2015), but star clusters are the most favourable test benches as they can contain samples of white dwarfs, which formed from a coeval population of stars . Ground-based follow-up spectroscopy is achievable for numerous cluster white dwarfs, enabling to assess a wide range of white dwarf progenitor masses, from 1.5-2 M (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%