2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2004.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing basic performance of a very small wind turbine designed for multi-purposes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The radius of blade is calculated based on the prediction of rated power, rated wind speed and total system efficiency: = √ 2 rated ρπ rated 3 η total (17) where Prated is the rated power, output from the blade, Vrated is the rated wind speed, usually assumed to be between 10 m/s and 12 m/s [5,6,11], ρ is the air density, and ηtotal is the total system efficiency, suggested to be 25% to 35% [11]. The system integration between the turbine blade and the generator is not considered in Equation (17).…”
Section: Geometry For Turbine Bladementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The radius of blade is calculated based on the prediction of rated power, rated wind speed and total system efficiency: = √ 2 rated ρπ rated 3 η total (17) where Prated is the rated power, output from the blade, Vrated is the rated wind speed, usually assumed to be between 10 m/s and 12 m/s [5,6,11], ρ is the air density, and ηtotal is the total system efficiency, suggested to be 25% to 35% [11]. The system integration between the turbine blade and the generator is not considered in Equation (17).…”
Section: Geometry For Turbine Bladementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation model, Cp is assumed to be between the values of 0.38 and 0.45 in Equation (17). Previously, Hirahara et al [11] obtained experimentally the maximum power coefficient of 0.40 and 0.36 in the rated running conditions using the HAWT blade with a radius of 0.25 m. Hsiao et al [5] obtained a maximum power coefficient of the HAWT blade to be 0.428 at the tip speed ratio of 4.92 using the BEM theory and wind tunnel experiments. The power coefficient in this study was assumed to be 0.4 based on the studies mentioned above.…”
Section: Geometry For Turbine Bladementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They lack the overall comprehensiveness addressing all the components together to develop a complete SSWT. Probably, the first attempt to make a complete SSWT was performed by Hirahara et al (2005). They developed a four-bladed 50 cm diameter small wind turbine called µF500 using NACA 2404 airfoil.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They lack the overall comprehensiveness addressing all the components together to develop a complete small scale wind turbine. Probably, the first attempt to make a complete SSWT was performed by Hirahara et al [34]. They developed a 4-bladed 50 cm diameter small wind turbine called reported with the flanged diffuser [42].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the LSWTs, the optimal tip speed ratio lies in the range of 8 to 10, whereas, for SSWTs, the value in the range of 2 to 4 has been suggested for the better reliability of performance and lower noise level [34]. The tip speed ratio was assumed to be λ =3.0, mean of 2 and 4 as a reliable initial guess.…”
Section: Airfoil Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%