2014
DOI: 10.1086/678768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing a multiple machine learning tool (HYDRA) for the bioassessment of fresh waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To build the dirty‐water predictive model, we simultaneously used three supervised machine learning techniques (SVM, MLP and KNN from the HYDRA tool; Feio et al, 2014a, 2014b) to predict the presence of each taxon under given environmental conditions. These techniques have been adapted to ecological studies, and have the ability to model and predict the distribution of species from a complex data set including nonlinear relationships and nonnormal distribution of variables, that make it difficult to use classical models based on discriminant functions (Gevrey et al, 2004; Rose et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To build the dirty‐water predictive model, we simultaneously used three supervised machine learning techniques (SVM, MLP and KNN from the HYDRA tool; Feio et al, 2014a, 2014b) to predict the presence of each taxon under given environmental conditions. These techniques have been adapted to ecological studies, and have the ability to model and predict the distribution of species from a complex data set including nonlinear relationships and nonnormal distribution of variables, that make it difficult to use classical models based on discriminant functions (Gevrey et al, 2004; Rose et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best model for each taxon was then used to define the probability of finding a taxon at a site. As all these approaches have advantages and disadvantages, depending on the type of data (Feio et al, 2014a, 2014b), their simultaneous use allows for the best possible predictions. The minimum taxon accuracy to accept a taxon prediction is 0.5, which means that a taxon is excluded from further analyses if its accuracy falls below 0.5 in all methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, Feio et al. , b, Rose et al. , b), or the approach applied apparently independently (e.g., Hargett et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%