Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
110
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
110
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…While relative reliability, expressed by means of the ICC, reflects a test's ability to differentiate between participants and, hence, the position of the individual relative to others in the group (Overend et al ., ), the absolute reliability represents the precision of the measurement and was determined by means of the SEM% and the MDC%. It appears to be accepted that a SEM variability of a measure lower than 10% could be considered appropriate for clinical purposes (Cejudo et al ., ). Higher values obtained in our study, with large thresholds to detect real changes, may not be sufficiently acceptable to recommend their use for monitoring changes at individual level (Hars et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While relative reliability, expressed by means of the ICC, reflects a test's ability to differentiate between participants and, hence, the position of the individual relative to others in the group (Overend et al ., ), the absolute reliability represents the precision of the measurement and was determined by means of the SEM% and the MDC%. It appears to be accepted that a SEM variability of a measure lower than 10% could be considered appropriate for clinical purposes (Cejudo et al ., ). Higher values obtained in our study, with large thresholds to detect real changes, may not be sufficiently acceptable to recommend their use for monitoring changes at individual level (Hars et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The passive hip flexion (passive straight leg raise test [Fig a in S1 appendix]), extension (Thomas test [Fig b in S1 appendix]) and abduction (passive hip abduction with knee flexed over the edge of the plinth test [Fig c in S1 appendix]); knee flexion (Modified Thomas test [Fig d in S1 appendix]) and ankle dorsiflexion (weight-bearing lunge with knee extended [Fig e in S1 appendix] and flexed [Fig f in S1 appendix] tests) range of motions of the dominant and non-dominant extremities were assessed following the methodology previously described [31]. Participants were instructed to perform, in a randomized order, two maximal trials of each range of motion test for each extremity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CV (standard error of measure [SEM] or typical error of measure [TE] expressed as percentage) data reported by previous inter-session reliability studies for each variable were used for the magnitude-based inference analyses. Thus, substantial is an absolute change > 2.5% for measures of range of motion [31], 18.5% for measures of H/Q strength ratios [32], 3.0% for measures of dynamic postural control [44], 1% for 10 and 20 m sprint times [45], 6% for DJ height [46] and 13.9% for measures of reactive strength index [47]. The qualitative descriptors proposed by Batterham and Hopkins [48] were used to interpret the probabilities (clinical inferences based on threshold chances of harm and benefit of 0.5% and 25%) that the true effects are harmful, trivial or beneficial: <1%, almost certainly not; 1–4%, very unlikely; 5–24%, unlikely or probably not; 25–74%, possibly or maybe; 75–94%, likely or probably; 95–99%, very likely; >99%, almost certainly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antes de aplicar las diferentes pruebas de valoración, todos los participantes realizaron un calentamiento estándar que incluía 5-10 minutos de carrera moderada seguido de 2 series de 30 segundos de ejercicios de estiramientos estáticos estandarizados, enfatizando la actividad de los músculos del miembro inferior, bajo la estricta supervisión de los examinadores (Cejudo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Procedimientounclassified
“…Previo a cada sesión de valoración, el inclinómetro fue calibrado a 0º con la vertical o la horizontal. Se registró el ángulo que forma el eje longitudinal del segmento movilizado (siguiendo su bisectriz) con la vertical o la horizontal (Gerhardt, Cocchiarella, Lea, 2002;Cejudo et al, 2015). Mientras que para la valoración del movimiento de abducción de cadera se utilizó un goniómetro metálico de rama larga (Baseline® Stainless).…”
Section: Procedimientounclassified