Territorial impact assessment: Integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies

Golobič, Mojca; Marot, Naja

doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.009

Cited by 31 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Even better than this would be the use of Territorial impact assessment techniques for the integration of territorial aspects in sectoral policies (Golobic & Marot, 2011), such as the proposed projects on hydrological planning.…”

Section: New Hydrological Planning and Its Integration With Regional mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of Hydrological and Regional and Urban Planning in Spain

Moreno¹

2012

Advances in Spatial Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: New Hydrological Planning and Its Integration With Regional mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of Hydrological and Regional and Urban Planning in Spain

Moreno¹

2012

Advances in Spatial Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, the TIA procedure can be regarded as the more complete and holistic 'IA procedure', as it places focus on all the territorial development dimensions, which include the social, the economic, the environmental, the governance and the spatial planning. So conceived, this TIA procedure can then be used to assess a particular sectoral policy (Golobič & Marot 2011) such as the transport policy (see Camagni 2009). …”

Section: The Tia Within the Other Ia Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the end, this article intends to further contribute to the debate of the TIA procedures, which has recently gained relevance within the regional and urban studies (see Tommi 2005;Martin & Tyler 2006;Camagni 2009;Golobič & Marot 2011;Medeiros 2013a). Yet, these analyses are still much centred on the econometric analysis (see Bradley 2006;Esposti & Bussoletti 2008;Varga & Veld 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing territorial impacts of the EU cohesion policy at the regional level: the case of Algarve

Medeiros

2014

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article focuses on presenting the main territorial impacts of the projects approved under the auspices of the EU Cohesion Policy in Algarve (Portugal), over the last couple of decades (1990 -2010). In general terms, it tunes up the TARGET_TIA methodology to assess the territorial impacts at the regional level. More concretely, it analyses the territorial impacts in the four main dimensions of territorial cohesion: socio-economic cohesion, environmental sustainability, territorial governance/cooperation and urban polycentricity. In syntheses, the territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy in Algarve were moderately positive in stimulating regional development.

show abstract

“…Several useful environmental assessment tools exist for promoting sustainable development, including strategic environmental assessment (SEA) [78,79], territorial impact assessment (TIA) [80,81] and spatial policy monitoring. These tools focus on the process by which environmental considerations are fully integrated into the preparation and adoption of policies, plans, and programs.…”

Section: Influential Factors In Environmental Change Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Environmental Change Efficiency to the Sustainability of Urban Development at the Neighborhood Level

Kuo

Tsou

2015

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study describes a new assessment model framework, termed the driving forces-pressure-state-impact-policy and pattern (DPSIP) model, for environmental change efficiency in urban land development, based on urban sustainable development and the theory of economic efficiency evaluation. A spatial and measurable efficiency value is defined for environmental changes in urban land development, which provides a comprehensive evaluation index for the efficiency of urban development and its environmental impact. This type of urban interior sustainability is considered new within the context of global environmental changes. We identify nine important indicators to evaluate the relative efficiency of 233 neighborhoods in Tainan, Taiwan. The results indicate that the average environmental change efficiency is 89.44%, which shows clear spatial differentiation. The key indicators affecting the efficiency score are area, population density, location, mixed land uses, the floor area ratio, and the impervious ratio. In the future, urban design can reduce environmental impacts and enhance efficiency values.

show abstract

Territorial impact assessment: Integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies

Cited by 31 publications

References 18 publications

Integration of Hydrological and Regional and Urban Planning in Spain

Integration of Hydrological and Regional and Urban Planning in Spain

Assessing territorial impacts of the EU cohesion policy at the regional level: the case of Algarve

Application of Environmental Change Efficiency to the Sustainability of Urban Development at the Neighborhood Level

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About