2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0471-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal variations of atmospheric aerosol in four European urban areas

Abstract: Significant quantitative and qualitative differences for particle mass across the four urban areas in Europe were observed. These were due to strong local and regional characteristics of particulate pollution sources which contribute to the heterogeneity of health responses. In addition, these findings also bear on the ability of different countries to comply with existing directives and the effectiveness of mitigation policies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure assessment has been described in previous publications [16-18,20]. In brief, during the entire study period (October 2002 to March 2004) in each city measurements of PM 2.5 , PM 10 and PNC were performed continuously at a central site representing urban background levels [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exposure assessment has been described in previous publications [16-18,20]. In brief, during the entire study period (October 2002 to March 2004) in each city measurements of PM 2.5 , PM 10 and PNC were performed continuously at a central site representing urban background levels [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associations of the health outcomes with gaseous air pollutants were also examined based on data collected from existing national monitoring networks in each country. The relationships between central site outdoor, residential outdoor and indoor concentrations, as well as the association between outdoor and indoor exposure to fine and ultrafine particles and lung function in the same participants but based on the intensive week measurements have been published before [16-20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were found for the PM 2.5 /PM 10 ratio at the Melpitz site in 2007 (EMEP 2009). Compared to other places these ratios are high and typical for a rural site with low influence of local emissions (Lianou et al 2011). …”
Section: Gravimetric Massmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Different meteorological conditions influence the physical and chemical size distribution in a complex manner (e.g. Vecchi et al 2007;Brüggemann et al 2009;Katzman et al 2010;Lianou et al 2011) by transport (wind direction, precipitation), dilution (mixing height and wind velocity), the distribution between gas and condensed phase (temperature and humidity) and chemical composition resulting from chemical conversions (including gas phase, multiphase and heterogeneous reactions) (e.g. Herrmann 2003;Peter et al 2010;Hamed et al 2010;Mikkonen et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased PN levels in the Athens and Milan metropolitan areas were also reported in the literature. Lianou et al (2011) Lonati et al (2011) conducted aerosol size distribution measurements for 22 days during the cold season at an urban background site in Milan and found median PN concentrations 1.87 × 10 4 for ultrafine particles and 4.89 × 10 3 for particles with mobility diameters between 100 nm and 1000 nm. Generally, following the work of Putaud et al (2010), who presented PN concentration levels in 29 European sites, the particle load in Oslo and Prague resembles the situation in near city background sites like Ispra (Italy) and Melpitz (Germany), while PN values in Milan and Athens are closer to those of traffic influenced urban sites like Belfast, Glasgow and Barcelona.…”
Section: An Overview Of Outdoor Particle Number Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%