2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.25.481796
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal matches and mismatches between monarch butterfly and milkweed population changes over the past 12,000 years

Abstract: In intimate ecological interactions, the interdependency of species may result in correlated demographic histories. For species of conservation concern, understanding the long-term dynamics of such interactions may shed light on the drivers of population decline. Here we address the demographic history of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus, and its dominant host plant, the common milkweed Asclepias syriaca, using broad-scale sampling and genomic inference. Because genetic resources for milkweed have lagge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the conflicting inferences provided by the two best‐performing model structures and the wide range of parameter estimates in the Three Epoch models. Although we present the results of both the simpler Found and Grow and Two Epoch models, and the more complicated Three Epoch model, we are inclined to place more confidence in the estimates produced by the Three Epoch model for two reasons: (i) the demographic scenario that it specifies—recent demographic expansion in the ancestral North American population prior to geographical expansion—has empirical support from other studies (Boyle et al, 2022; Pfeiler et al, 2017; Zhan et al, 2014) and accords with our understanding of past changes in climate, and (ii) this model structure produces parameter estimates that match our prior understanding for how and when monarch range expansion may have occurred. The latter point is related to the former: because a North American population expansion is not allowed until after the founding of Hawaii in the Found and Grow model, this model forces an ancient founding of the Hawaiian population in order to allow for the ancient growth of the North American population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is due to the conflicting inferences provided by the two best‐performing model structures and the wide range of parameter estimates in the Three Epoch models. Although we present the results of both the simpler Found and Grow and Two Epoch models, and the more complicated Three Epoch model, we are inclined to place more confidence in the estimates produced by the Three Epoch model for two reasons: (i) the demographic scenario that it specifies—recent demographic expansion in the ancestral North American population prior to geographical expansion—has empirical support from other studies (Boyle et al, 2022; Pfeiler et al, 2017; Zhan et al, 2014) and accords with our understanding of past changes in climate, and (ii) this model structure produces parameter estimates that match our prior understanding for how and when monarch range expansion may have occurred. The latter point is related to the former: because a North American population expansion is not allowed until after the founding of Hawaii in the Found and Grow model, this model forces an ancient founding of the Hawaiian population in order to allow for the ancient growth of the North American population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…S4 and S5 and Table S4 ). We assessed F ST using 925 established single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) ( 23 ) in each of 12 of the 24 sampled populations. Phenotypic differences between populations ( P ST ) were substantially greater than F ST for labriformin and syrioside B (but not for the other dominant cardenolides), indicating spatially divergent selection on these compounds ( SI Appendix ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although smaller in total length, the 11 pseudomolecules of the A. curassavica genome assembly are highly colinear with the A. syriaca genome assembly (Boyle et al, 2022) (Figure 3). The A. syriaca genome was found to have a greater expansion of LTR retroelements relative to A. curassavica , contributing to its larger size (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OrthoFinder v2.5.2 (Emms & Kelly, 2015) was used to identify gene families using protein sequences from genome-sequenced close relatives to A. curassavica with genome annotations. The following species were included: A. curassavica v1.0 , Asclepias syriaca v1.0 (Boyle et al, 2022), Calotropis gigantea (Hoopes et al, 2018), Catharanthus roseus (Kellner et al, 2015), Rhazya stricta (Sabir et al, 2016), Eustoma grandiflorum (Liang et al, 2022), Gelsemium sempervirens (Frank et al, 2015), Neolamarckia cadamba (Zhao et al, 2022), Chiococca alba (Lau et al, 2020), Coffea canephora v1.0 (Denoeud et al, 2014). These results were used to create an Upset plot using the UpSetR package v1.4.0 (Conway et al, 2017) depicting shared and unique gene clusters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%