2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal dynamics of groundwater-surface water interaction under the effects of climate change: A case study in the Kiskatinaw River Watershed, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustainable groundwater management has also been addressed in cold and humid climates where GR is often considered to be abundant and non-limiting (i.e., Dripps et al 2007;Rivard et al 2014;Boumaiza et al 2020). However, even when water is abundant overall, increased temperatures due to climate change may trigger increased evapotranspiration rates during the summer when water needs are the greatest (e.g., agriculture and recreational activities) and this can have large impacts on groundwater renewal rates (Turkeltaub et al 2015;Saha et al 2017;Guerrero-Morales et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainable groundwater management has also been addressed in cold and humid climates where GR is often considered to be abundant and non-limiting (i.e., Dripps et al 2007;Rivard et al 2014;Boumaiza et al 2020). However, even when water is abundant overall, increased temperatures due to climate change may trigger increased evapotranspiration rates during the summer when water needs are the greatest (e.g., agriculture and recreational activities) and this can have large impacts on groundwater renewal rates (Turkeltaub et al 2015;Saha et al 2017;Guerrero-Morales et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of human activities on the water resource system is more obvious in arid and semi-arid areas, such as in river diversion by damming [7] water diversion irrigation [8], GW overdraft [9] and water quality deterioration [10], which change the original SW-GW interaction mode and decrease their exchange in some basins. Saha et al [11] studied the dynamics of SW-GW interactions under the impact of climate change based on the temporal average contribution of GW to SW. Their results show that these contributions vary monthly, seasonally and annually due to precipitation variations. Based on long-term observation data, Wang et al [12] deduced the strong impacts of climate change and human activities on the GW system and basin base flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing physically based hydrological modeling approaches taking into consideration both surface and subsurface processes in order to project the climate change impacts on surface-groundwater interactions has not been well documented as of yet. To that respect, a few studies have investigated the interconnection between a groundwater system and a river network under a changing climate (Goderniaux et al, 2011(Goderniaux et al, , 2015; P. Goderniaux et al, 2009;Saha et al, 2017;Scibek et al, 2007). Moreover, a few works have explored the response of groundwater-dependent ecosystems, including wetlands, lakes, and riparian areas to climate change scenarios (Dwire et al, 2017;Havril et al, 2017;Klove et al, 2014;Taviani & Henriksen, 2015;van Engelenburg et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a spatiotemporal analysis of the climate change scenario on the surface‐groundwater interactions represented by the gaining/losing streams in relation to their adjoining groundwater domain was not conducted. Notwithstanding the previous studies, Saha et al (2017) explored the groundwater discharge/baseflow generated from gaining reaches under climate change scenarios A2 and B1 of SRES using a physically based and distributed model, that is, Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA). Although the baseflow, supplied by the gaining streams, was projected for 2020–2040 for different temporal scales, the spatial variability of this water component across the Kiskatinaw River Watershed in British Columbia, Canada, was not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%