Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1835449.1835486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal diversity in recommender systems

Abstract: Collaborative Filtering (CF) algorithms, used to build webbased recommender systems, are often evaluated in terms of how accurately they predict user ratings. However, current evaluation techniques disregard the fact that users continue to rate items over time: the temporal characteristics of the system's top-N recommendations are not investigated. In particular, there is no means of measuring the extent that the same items are being recommended to users over and over again. In this work, we show that temporal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
111
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more recent studies (Zhang & Hurley, 2008;Zhou et al, 2010) have observed that this type of approach might lead to a situation where the recommendations offered are 'monothematic' and repetitive and therefore end up being boring to the user. As a way to mitigate this effect and enhance user satisfaction, recent approaches to recommender systems have started investigating and incorporating diversity into their design (Lathia, Hailes, Capra, & Amatriain, 2010;Ozturk & Han, 2014;Vargas & Castells, 2011).…”
Section: Exposure Diversity Through Software Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, more recent studies (Zhang & Hurley, 2008;Zhou et al, 2010) have observed that this type of approach might lead to a situation where the recommendations offered are 'monothematic' and repetitive and therefore end up being boring to the user. As a way to mitigate this effect and enhance user satisfaction, recent approaches to recommender systems have started investigating and incorporating diversity into their design (Lathia, Hailes, Capra, & Amatriain, 2010;Ozturk & Han, 2014;Vargas & Castells, 2011).…”
Section: Exposure Diversity Through Software Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, in discovery services, such as news media and social media, providing diverse choices (instead of merely personalized ones) could be considered an element of quality; a route to intensified engagement with the user and even a selling point. In a similar sense, Zhang and Hurley (2008) and Lathia et al (2010) have argued that the lack of variation can also have a frustrating effect on users, while Schönbach (2007) argued that people actually buy news media because they are interested in what he calls 'reliable surprises'.…”
Section: Exposure Diversity Through Software Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of focusing on perceived diversity is that we can directly capture the users' opinions. Lathia et al (2010) found that perceived diversity is positively related to user satisfaction in the long term when using a recommender system. Regarding the importance of perceived diversity, this paper will analyse how end users perceive the diversityincreasing items in recommendation lists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As an example, it is preferable that both sci-fi and romance movies be included in the RecList if the target previously watched movies from the sci-fi and romance genres. For an interpretation from another perspective, Lathia et al [40] introduces temporal diversity, and suggests that recommended items for the same target be changed as time goes by. Novelty: Novelty refers to the degree of discovery difficulty of an item recommended to a target.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%