2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal detection and analysis of guideline interactions

Abstract: We propose an innovative approach to the detection and analysis of interactions between CPGs considering different sources of temporal information (CPGs, ontological knowledge and execution logs), which is the first one in the literature that takes into account the temporal issues, and accounts for different application scenarios.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step in the extension of GLARE to cope with comorbidities was the identification of the different tasks to be solved. In strict cooperation with the physicians in our team, we identified the following tasks: (1) The detection of interactions occurring between CIGs 2The management of the interactions 3The final merging of the CIGs We have separately discussed in technical detail our techniques to cope with each task independently of the others in previous publications, mostly in conference papers (interaction detection [9], interaction management [10], conciliation [11] and temporal reasoning for comorbidities [12], [13]). Notably, to cope with the medical problem, several advances with respect to the AI state of the art were achieved, such as the treatment of complexand not explored yettemporal issues [13], and an innovative approach to conditional plan merging [11].…”
Section: Glare-sscpm: General Architecture and Behavior Of The Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first step in the extension of GLARE to cope with comorbidities was the identification of the different tasks to be solved. In strict cooperation with the physicians in our team, we identified the following tasks: (1) The detection of interactions occurring between CIGs 2The management of the interactions 3The final merging of the CIGs We have separately discussed in technical detail our techniques to cope with each task independently of the others in previous publications, mostly in conference papers (interaction detection [9], interaction management [10], conciliation [11] and temporal reasoning for comorbidities [12], [13]). Notably, to cope with the medical problem, several advances with respect to the AI state of the art were achieved, such as the treatment of complexand not explored yettemporal issues [13], and an innovative approach to conditional plan merging [11].…”
Section: Glare-sscpm: General Architecture and Behavior Of The Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, during interaction detection, temporal reasoning must be used to check whether possible interaction can actually occur or not, given the temporal information available in the knowledge base (temporal constraints between actions and the variations they cause) and in the CIGs (temporal constraints between actions), and the time of execution of previous actions on the patient. We have chosen to devote a specific module, the Temporal module [13] in Figure 1, operating as a knowledge server, to cope with temporal constraints and temporal reasoning. Our treatment of temporal constraints is grounded on the STP framework, that we have extended along several directions to support several facilities, such as checking whether two actions may temporally interact, or determining execution times of some future actions to avoid some interactions.…”
Section: Temporal Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, … , -∈ " denote the s lowest qualitative values in the scale " (i.e., # = " ( ), 1 ≤ ≤ ). ■ For instance, the constraint between two consecutive administrations of NA (NA1 and NA2) in Example 2 can be represented through the "compact" PyP_STP constraint ⟨ 1, 2, ⟨⟨ [10,15], ⟩, ⟨ [11,13], ⟩, ⟨ [12,12], ℎ ℎ⟩⟩⟩.…”
Section: Definition 2 Pyramid Preference Function (Ppf) a Pyramid Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the "compact" PyP_STP ⟨ 1, 2, ⟨⟨ [10,15], ⟩, ⟨ [11,13], ⟩, ⟨ [12,12], ℎ ℎ⟩⟩⟩ represents the fact that the difference between NA2 and NA1 has preference "high" if it is exactly 12, "medium" if it is 11 or 13, and "low" if it is 10, or between 14 and 15.…”
Section: Definition 2 Pyramid Preference Function (Ppf) a Pyramid Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of timing fragments directly affects the temporal accuracy for recognizing the behavior. Many methods use the approach of generating candidate regions and then categorizing the candidates [12]. The important factor is that the candidate quality must be high, so the number of candidates is reduced as much as possible while ensuring the average recall rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%