2021
DOI: 10.1186/s42523-021-00119-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and nutritional effects on the weaner pig ileal microbiota

Abstract: Background The porcine gastrointestinal microbiota has been linked to both host health and performance. Most pig gut microbiota studies target faecal material, which is not representative of microbiota dynamics in other discrete gut sections. The weaning transition period in pigs is a key development stage, with gastrointestinal problems being prominent after often sudden introduction to a solid diet. A better understanding of both temporal and nutritional effects on the small intestinal microb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(82 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ETEC colonize in the small intestine, thus these results indicate that ETEC inoculation perturbed the gut microbial community more in the ileum than in the cecum [ 51 ]. Our results agree with findings of a previous study that Firmicutes and Proteobacteria are predominantly abundant in ileal digesta of weaned pigs [ 52 ]. With reduced microbial richness and evenness in ileal digesta of pigs infected with ETEC, differences in microbial taxa abundance were expected between sham and ETEC infected pigs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…ETEC colonize in the small intestine, thus these results indicate that ETEC inoculation perturbed the gut microbial community more in the ileum than in the cecum [ 51 ]. Our results agree with findings of a previous study that Firmicutes and Proteobacteria are predominantly abundant in ileal digesta of weaned pigs [ 52 ]. With reduced microbial richness and evenness in ileal digesta of pigs infected with ETEC, differences in microbial taxa abundance were expected between sham and ETEC infected pigs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Overall, in the absence of additional biological replicates, the insights brought by 16S sequencing were limited to the description of the microbial community. The results showed more richness and evenness in steel than PVC, and this was in line with the taxonomy results, with the presence of a large proportion of bacteria on coupons, such as Lactobacillales, Clostridiales, Bacillales, Actinomycetales, Pseudomonadales, Bacteroidales, and Enterobacteriales, already found in other pig studies [47][48][49]. A bias in this community profiling arises from the high quantities of bacterial eDNA from feces on the surface that can be sequenced in addition to the living bacteria that multiply in such biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%