2021
DOI: 10.7150/thno.54881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal analysis of type 1 interferon activation in tumor cells following external beam radiotherapy or targeted radionuclide therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
58
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…43 In addition, Jagodinsky et al demonstrated a STING-dependent type I interferon activation in melanomas, head and neck cancer murine models following TRNT. 33 Despite the expression of CS1 on T-cells, we did not observe any detrimental effect on the T cell population, in contrast we found a significant increase in the percentage CD8 + T-cells after TRNT. All these data point to the immune-stimulating properties of TRNT and its therapeutic potential in combination with current immunotherapeutic approaches including immune checkpoint inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…43 In addition, Jagodinsky et al demonstrated a STING-dependent type I interferon activation in melanomas, head and neck cancer murine models following TRNT. 33 Despite the expression of CS1 on T-cells, we did not observe any detrimental effect on the T cell population, in contrast we found a significant increase in the percentage CD8 + T-cells after TRNT. All these data point to the immune-stimulating properties of TRNT and its therapeutic potential in combination with current immunotherapeutic approaches including immune checkpoint inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Similar to gene-signature cell type profiling, relative increases in CD3, CD8 and FoxP3 TILs were observed by IHC in primary tumors, although this was maximal at 13 days by IHC assessment. The timing of increased relative abundance of TIL cell profile expression signatures and IHC TIL numbers (i.e., peak at day 6–13) mimics observations we have reported in murine melanoma models for tumor immune susceptibility gene expression changes with EBRT [ 61 ] and with TRT [ 62 ] and cellular infiltrate changes with EBRT + IT-IC [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…One example is their combined effect on the immune system. EBRT induces a plethora of immune-activating mechanisms and emerging evidence shows that MRT can also increase sensitivity to cytotoxic immune cells and promote lymphocyte recruitment and activation [18,19]. Early reports indicate that the timing of changes in the immune landscape may differ for the two treatments; it is plausible that these differences could be harnessed for therapeutic gain [19,20].…”
Section: Enhancement Of Tumour Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBRT induces a plethora of immune-activating mechanisms and emerging evidence shows that MRT can also increase sensitivity to cytotoxic immune cells and promote lymphocyte recruitment and activation [18,19]. Early reports indicate that the timing of changes in the immune landscape may differ for the two treatments; it is plausible that these differences could be harnessed for therapeutic gain [19,20]. Another exploitable interaction is the increase in blood flow and vessel permeability after exposure to EBRT which, when immediately preceded or followed by MRT, can enhance intra-tumoural accumulation of radioactivity [21,22].…”
Section: Enhancement Of Tumour Responsementioning
confidence: 99%