2004
DOI: 10.1080/00364820410002532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-dependent otolith growth in Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus L.) larvae

Abstract: Folkvord A, Johannessen A, Moksness E. 2004. Temperature-dependent otolith growth in Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus L.) larvae. Sarsia 89:297-310. SARSIANorwegian spring-spawning herring larvae (Clupea harengus L.) were reared at different temperature combinations in the laboratory, and marked twice with a fluorescent dye, alizarin complexone, to estimate otolith growth and increment deposition rate. A daily increment deposition rate was confirmed in the sagittae of larvae reared at 12°C fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute age of larvae in this study was unknown as capelin larvae are known to delay first check formation (Ivarjord et al 2008) but the variables controlling the delay process remain to be discovered. Research into first check formation in herring larvae (Folkvord et al 2004) and cod larvae (Otterlei et al 2002) indicate a strong influence of temperature, with increment formation starting at a later age in larvae experiencing lower temperatures. To our knowledge, no temperature validation study has been conducted for capelin larvae.…”
Section: Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute age of larvae in this study was unknown as capelin larvae are known to delay first check formation (Ivarjord et al 2008) but the variables controlling the delay process remain to be discovered. Research into first check formation in herring larvae (Folkvord et al 2004) and cod larvae (Otterlei et al 2002) indicate a strong influence of temperature, with increment formation starting at a later age in larvae experiencing lower temperatures. To our knowledge, no temperature validation study has been conducted for capelin larvae.…”
Section: Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the analysis of otolith microstructure in archival collections of larvae is a powerful tool for determining life history trajectories such as somatic growth. The otolith microstructure is strongly influenced by the environmental conditions experienced during the larval phase, such as temperature (Folkvord et al 2004) and food availability . Where feeding conditions are sufficient for growth, herring larvae can deposit daily increments on their otoliths and thus the individual larval otolith microstructure can be used as a proxy for the general growth conditions (Geffen 1982, McGurk 1984, Fox et al 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somatic growth rates < 0.2 mm d -1 are expected at the cold temperatures of 4 to 5°C that characterise the stable intermediate layers where Baltic sprat Sprattus sprattus eggs and early larvae develop (Nissling 2004). These low somatic growth rates would induce the low otolith growth rates found for small larvae, which are in the range of those reported for other clupeids (Folkvord et al 2004). In this approach, the increase of somatic growth rates (to levels > 0.4 mm d -1 ) with increasing sprat size would explain the deposition of the first clear increment and subsequent regular increments at lengths >16 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In our study, distance to the first clear increment formation was independent of temperature. Only after the first increment formation did subsequent regular increments increase with temperature at rates similar to those found in other species (Neilson & Geen 1982, Mosegaard & Titus 1987, Hoff & Fuiman 1993, Folkvord et al 2004). These results are in accordance with a predominance of 16 mm long larvae found above the thermocline, whereas smaller larvae develop in stable cold water layers (Wieland & Zuzarte 1991, Makarchouk & Hinrichsen 1998.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%