Televised medical talk shows--what they recommend and the evidence to support their recommendations: a prospective observational study

Abstract

Objective To determine the quality of health recommendations and claims made on popular medical talk shows.Design Prospective observational study. Setting Mainstream television media. SourcesInternationally syndicated medical television talk shows that air daily (The Dr Oz Show and The Doctors). Interventions Investigators randomly selected 40 episodes of each ofThe Dr Oz Show and The Doctors from early 2013 and identified and evaluated all recommendations made on each program. A group of experienced evidence reviewers independently searched for, and evaluated as a team, evidence to support 80 randomly selected recommendations from each show. Main outcomes measuresPercentage of recommendations that are supported by evidence as determined by a team of experienced evidence reviewers. Secondary outcomes included topics discussed, the number of recommendations made on the shows, and the types and details of recommendations that were made. ResultsWe could find at least a case study or better evidence to support 54% (95% confidence interval 47% to 62%) of the 160 recommendations (80 from each show). For recommendations in The Dr Oz Show, evidence supported 46%, contradicted 15%, and was not found for 39%. For recommendations in The Doctors, evidence supported 63%, contradicted 14%, and was not found for 24%. Believable or somewhat believable evidence supported 33% of the recommendations on The Dr Oz Show and 53% on The Doctors. On average, The Dr Oz Show had 12 recommendations per episode and The Doctors 11. The most common recommendation category on The Dr Oz Show was dietary advice (39%) and on The Doctors was to consult a healthcare provider (18%). A specific benefit was described for 43% and 41% of the recommendations made on the shows respectively. The magnitude of benefit was described for 17% of the recommendations on The Dr Oz Show and 11% on The Doctors. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest accompanied 0.4% of recommendations. ConclusionsRecommendations made on medical talk shows often lack adequate information on specific benefits or the magnitude of the effects of these benefits. Approximately half of the recommendations have either no evidence or are contradicted by the best available evidence. Potential conflicts of interest are rarely addressed. The public should be skeptical about recommendations made on medical talk shows.Additional details of methods used and changes made to study protocol

Exploring the Effect of Scripted Roles on Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous Online Discussions

“…Given the current obesity crisis Ogden Carroll, Lawman, Fryar, Kruszon-Moran, Kit, & Flegal, 2016), it has become increasing clear that certain environmental constraints raise the risks for obesity (Myers, Slack, Martin, Broyles, & Heymsfield, 2016), and that there is a remarkable amount of nutritional misinformation circulating in popular culture (Korownyk, Kolber, McCormack, Lam, Overbo, Cotton, & Allan, 2014;Wansink, 2005). Nutritional knowledge has thus become essential for maintaining a healthy lifestyle.…”

The Case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, Evidence, and Does Professional Self-Regulation Work?

“…It's common for Dr. Oz to offer some plausible mechanism from test tube experiments conducted by manufacturers, combined with personal anecdotes from his own or consumers' experience, to support the products he's promoting. A study of 80 recommendations made on The Dr. Oz Show in early 2013 found that published evidence supported 46 percent of recommendations, contradicted 15 percent, and did not support 39 percent [20]. Yet, his visible display of inconclusive evidence merely highlights questions about the boundaries of what counts as legitimate evidence in modern medicine.…”

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television: are we miseducating the public?

“…Television is well established to be an important source of health information for members of the general public 13. We have found that CPR on televised medical dramas is inadequately performed.…”