Telecare, telehealth and assistive technologies: do we know what we're talking about?

Abstract

The development of telecare services across the UK has been supported by grants from the respective governments of Scotland and Wales, and by the DH in England. New services are being established to sometimes operate alongside existing community equipment services and community alarm services. Elsewhere they are embracing a wider range of services including rehabilitation, intermediate care and health services designed to reduce the use of unscheduled care services. This paper discusses the difficulties in understanding the scope of telecare services, and the definitions of services that will need to be confirmed so that service users can choose appropriately if offered direct payments. Two different service models are offered, one of which uses telehealth as an umbrella term to cover all telecare, e-care and m-care, and telemedicine where the former includes all such services offered in the service user's home, including those of a medical nature. The second model views telecare alongside assistive technologies and telemedicine as one of three different technology groups designed to make people more independent or to bring care closer to home. There is significant overlap between the three groups, which justifies the introduction of a new term-ARTS (assistive and remote technology services)-to describe this area of support.

Telecare acceptance as sticky entrapment: A realist review

“…WoS and Scopus had very similar hits resulting in a huge quantity of duplicates while EV gave very few hits except where 'technology' was the only search term. The lack of unified definitions of terms describing technology in health and care services presented challenges [12][13][14] . Therefore, a variety of key words was necessary to cover relevant literature and the papers were thoroughly checked to identify the relevance of the technology used.…”

“…'Telecare' is used in substantially different ways which makes it even more challenging to assess telecare acceptance due to ambiguity to what is actually assessed [12][13][14] . This paper uses the definition of telecare from the Department of Health (UK):…”

Robot carers, ethics, and older people

“…Ramps, handholds, special kinds of lighting, highly legible telephone handsets and walkers are among the kinds of equipment that might be added to a conventionally designed house to adapt it to a resident with physical disabilities (Doughty et al 2007;Alaszewski and Cappello 2006). Then there is a variety of sensors and alarms, some designed to alert the householder to a risk, and some designed to alert a source of outside help.…”

A holistic review and framework for sustainable business models for assisted living technologies and services

“…Today telehealth services use a combination of sensors, hubs and remote servers to provide better and more cost efficient management of chronic conditions such as diabetes, COPD, heart failure and asthma (Lewin, Adshead et al 2010). Figure 2 shows what (Doughty, Monk et al 2007) described as the "telehealth umbrella model" which can be used to help map and define these products. This model shows the wide range of assistive technologies that are available and also categorises them to the settings they are suited; home or within an institution e.g.…”