2018
DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2018-12-30-33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technologies for the development of the Achimov deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reservoirs with permeability less than 0.010 µm 2 have actual oil recovery factors in the range of 0.014 to 0.235, with an average value of 0.138. In general, with a water cut of about 80%, the withdrawal of initial recoverable reserve is not more than 35-40% of its calculated value [18][19][20][21]. With such ratios of water cut and oil recovery, it can be argued that with the existing development system based on water injection, the calculated values of oil recovery factors are overestimated and will not be achieved [22][23][24].…”
Section: Inefficiency Of Using Traditional Pressure Maintenance Methods In the Development Of Low Permeability Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reservoirs with permeability less than 0.010 µm 2 have actual oil recovery factors in the range of 0.014 to 0.235, with an average value of 0.138. In general, with a water cut of about 80%, the withdrawal of initial recoverable reserve is not more than 35-40% of its calculated value [18][19][20][21]. With such ratios of water cut and oil recovery, it can be argued that with the existing development system based on water injection, the calculated values of oil recovery factors are overestimated and will not be achieved [22][23][24].…”
Section: Inefficiency Of Using Traditional Pressure Maintenance Methods In the Development Of Low Permeability Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%