2018
DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2018.1426391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ motives for learning in networks: costs, rewards and community interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Organisation, finally, refers to the extent to which the members share social norms, the extent to which they are self-organised based on hierarchical or equal relationships and the extent to which they have a focus on local or global activities. Research shows a positive impact of the indicators of these four dimensions and the perceived sense of community and learning (Schreurs et al 2014;Van den Beemt et al 2018). For example, networks whose participants perceive the network as a team and show attention to each other both professionally and informally, who have an open attitude towards their work and development, and a supportive attitude toward non-participants are represented in the DSL-framework with high scores on indicators such as social activities, broadening and deepening knowledge, mutual engagement and a shared interactional repertoire (see also Raes et al 2017).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Engineering Education and Networked Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisation, finally, refers to the extent to which the members share social norms, the extent to which they are self-organised based on hierarchical or equal relationships and the extent to which they have a focus on local or global activities. Research shows a positive impact of the indicators of these four dimensions and the perceived sense of community and learning (Schreurs et al 2014;Van den Beemt et al 2018). For example, networks whose participants perceive the network as a team and show attention to each other both professionally and informally, who have an open attitude towards their work and development, and a supportive attitude toward non-participants are represented in the DSL-framework with high scores on indicators such as social activities, broadening and deepening knowledge, mutual engagement and a shared interactional repertoire (see also Raes et al 2017).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Engineering Education and Networked Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, in places like Flanders, schools are parts of local communities and in the Netherlands there are not only collaborations with other schools, but also support processes with community organizations and public services (Muijs, 2015). Similarly, the published study in the Netherlands by Van Den Beemt et al (2018) focuses on learning in networks as a form of teacher professional learning.…”
Section: Context Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in every program that will be held by the community has a very important role because without the participation of the community, every program that will be carried out will be in vain [11], [12]. Like what is found in Tanah Merah Urban Village, Binjai City, there are still many people who drop out of school.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, community participation in the implementation of non-formal education programs is very necessary, because the success or failure of a program because it is very dependent on the size of community participation in development, with community participation or public participation, the planned program will achieve its objectives [13], [11], [14]. So, in this study the focus of research lies in how the level of community participation in the implementation of senior high school equality education programs in PKBM Cahaya.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%