2018
DOI: 10.1080/1547688x.2017.1407852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Candidates Learn to Enact Curriculum in a Partnership-Sponsored Literacy Enrichment Program for Youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Camp Questions took place in a Leroy school and was linked to a monthlong Etna graduate course entitled "Literacy Across the Curriculum." To achieve its pedagogical goal of building candidate capacity to teach literacy across the disciplines, the program (Chandler-Olcott et al, 2018, 2021 was designed with five essential elements (Colwell et al, 2013) grounded in the literature on literacy pedagogy and teacher education. The five elements were: (1) enrichment for a heterogeneous population of students, (2) collaboration in shared space by adults across experience levels and roles, (3) literacy conceptualized as multimodal communication across contexts, (4) support for student inquiry, and (5) lesson studywith the latter being the focus of this paper.…”
Section: The Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Camp Questions took place in a Leroy school and was linked to a monthlong Etna graduate course entitled "Literacy Across the Curriculum." To achieve its pedagogical goal of building candidate capacity to teach literacy across the disciplines, the program (Chandler-Olcott et al, 2018, 2021 was designed with five essential elements (Colwell et al, 2013) grounded in the literature on literacy pedagogy and teacher education. The five elements were: (1) enrichment for a heterogeneous population of students, (2) collaboration in shared space by adults across experience levels and roles, (3) literacy conceptualized as multimodal communication across contexts, (4) support for student inquiry, and (5) lesson studywith the latter being the focus of this paper.…”
Section: The Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, such mandates were grounded in generic, content-literacy perspectives, which foregrounded students’ learning discrete routines and often focused on teacher-orchestrated activities during instruction (Moje, 2008). Although candidates often embrace such approaches during preservice coursework, their enthusiasm can be dampened when they encounter skepticism from veteran colleagues (Sturtevant et al ., 2001) and/or confront obstacles such as high-stakes tests with narrow conceptualizations of literacy, overstuffed curricula, and limited time (Chandler-Olcott et al. , 2018).…”
Section: Context and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partnership has pursued multiple initiatives related to lesson study, including attendance at an annual local conference focused on lesson study and science, a book club for university faculty and district leaders centered on two guides to facilitating lesson study, and annual public research lessons during a summer literacy camp for Leroy students (Chandler-Olcott et al, 2018).…”
Section: Study Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPB structures are short-term opportunities where preservice teachers partner with school-and university-based teacher educators to work with youth, often focusing on young people who are disenfranchised by school and its core literacy tasks (Thompson, Hagenah, Lohwasser, & Laxton, 2015). Such structures position preservice teachers as mentors and coaches for youths in real classrooms, most often addressing adolescents' writing development and relationships (Chandler-Olcott et al, 2018). As a literacy skill that is relevant to all subject areas, writing ability and efficacy are closely related to students' overall school achievement and closely tied to their decisions to graduate from or drop out of high school (Hickman et al, 2017;Paquette & Laverkirk, 2017).…”
Section: Clinical Experience Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPB structures are short-term opportunities where preservice teachers partner with school- and university-based teacher educators to work with youth, often focusing on young people who are disenfranchised by school and its core literacy tasks (Thompson, Hagenah, Lohwasser, & Laxton, 2015). Such structures position preservice teachers as mentors and coaches for youths in real classrooms, most often addressing adolescents’ writing development and relationships (Chandler-Olcott et al. , 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%