2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12526-019-00998-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy and phylogeny of mud owls (Annelida: Sternaspidae), including a new synonymy and new records from the Southern Ocean, North East Atlantic Ocean and Pacific Ocean: challenges in morphological delimitation

Abstract: Species delimitation in sternaspid polychaetes is currently based on the morphology of a limited suite of characters, namely characters of the ventro-caudal shield-a unique feature of the family. Sternaspid species description has increased rapidly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly known as mud owls, Sternaspidae are distinctive round-bodied or peanut-shaped worms are easily recognized by their characteristic and often colourful ventro-caudal shield ( Drennan et al 2019 ). Currently, Sternaspidae is comprised of 42 species in three genera, with the largest genus, Sternaspis Otto, 1820, containing 32 species ( Read and Fauchald 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly known as mud owls, Sternaspidae are distinctive round-bodied or peanut-shaped worms are easily recognized by their characteristic and often colourful ventro-caudal shield ( Drennan et al 2019 ). Currently, Sternaspidae is comprised of 42 species in three genera, with the largest genus, Sternaspis Otto, 1820, containing 32 species ( Read and Fauchald 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their morphological study resulted in the distinction of three genera (Sternaspis Otto, 1821, Caulleryaspis Sendall & Salazar-Vallejo, 2013and Petersenaspis Sendall & Salazar-Vallejo, 2013 and a rapid increase of the number of species from 13 to 44, including the species described herein (Fiege 2016(Fiege , 2019. With Sternaspis monroi Salazar-Vallejo, 2014, recently synoymized with S. sendalli Salazar-Vallejo, 2014(Drennan et al 2019, the actual number of species comes to 43.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our present knowledge of the morphology, anatomy, biology and phylogeny of the group was summarized by Fiege (2016Fiege ( , 2019. A recent study by Drennan et al (2019) investigated the phylogenetic relationships using molecular markers both within Sternaspidae as well as their position among the Polychaeta as a major taxon. Their molecular data of three genes (16S, 18S and CO1) places Sternaspidae next to Scalibregmatidae Malmgren, 1867 and these two families as a sistergroup of Cirratuliformia Fauchald, 1977 while other phylogenetic analyses using a higher number of genes paired Sternaspidae with Fauveliopsidae Hartman, 1971 (e.g., Rousset et al 2007; for details see Fiege 2019 andDrennan et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, morphology can also overestimate species diversity. For example, the only two species of sternaspid polychetes described from the Southern Ocean, Sternaspis sendalli and Sternaspis monroi, were recently synonymized (the latter now the junior synonym) based on a molecular investigation that found little genetic structure between the two despite considerable variation in diagnostic morphological characters (Drennan et al, 2019). Furthermore, Polynoidae, the most morphospecies rich family in the current study, can display considerable degrees of intraspecific variation yet remain a single genetic species, as in the case of Harmothoe imbricata (Linnaeus, 1767) from waters off Scandinavia and Svalbard, which has at least ten distinct color morphs yet little genetic variation (Nygren et al, 2011).…”
Section: Morphological Limitations and Future Molecular Workmentioning
confidence: 99%