2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40657-021-00288-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic revision of the Savanna Nightjar (Caprimulgus affinis) complex based on vocalizations reveals three species

Abstract: Background The Savanna Nightjar (Caprimulgus affinis) is a widespread, polytypic species which was previously treated as two or three species. It is currently treated as a single species based on superficial similarity of their songs but no detailed comparisons of the songs in this complex have been made. Methods A total of 15 acoustic variables were measured for the songs of 86 individuals representing 8 of the 10 subspecies in the complex. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A SIMPER (similarity percentage: Clarke 1993) analysis was conducted to identify which variables contributed most to any difference between the identified groups (Clarke 1993;Hammer et al 2001). The most significant variables were further examined using Cohen's d effect size (Cohen 1988), which has become the preferred method for testing differences between avian biometrics (Tobias et al 2010;Collar et al 2015;Lenhard & Lenhard 2016;Donegan 2018;Ho et al 2019;Sangster et al 2021). Finally, we included an analysis of the five suspect egrets from Cairns that instigated this study, and attempted to assign them to a specific taxon using the universal effect size (UES) diagnosability test provided by Donegan (2018) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA, also known as canonical variate analysis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SIMPER (similarity percentage: Clarke 1993) analysis was conducted to identify which variables contributed most to any difference between the identified groups (Clarke 1993;Hammer et al 2001). The most significant variables were further examined using Cohen's d effect size (Cohen 1988), which has become the preferred method for testing differences between avian biometrics (Tobias et al 2010;Collar et al 2015;Lenhard & Lenhard 2016;Donegan 2018;Ho et al 2019;Sangster et al 2021). Finally, we included an analysis of the five suspect egrets from Cairns that instigated this study, and attempted to assign them to a specific taxon using the universal effect size (UES) diagnosability test provided by Donegan (2018) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA, also known as canonical variate analysis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vocalisations have not yet been used in the species-level taxonomy of Accipitridae but may be informative for two major reasons (Sangster et al 2021). First, vocalisations often play a role in mate choice and pair bonding, so differences among populations in such vocalisations may be indicative of reproductive barriers (Slabbekoorn and Smith 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%