2012
DOI: 10.1206/3736.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tarsal Organ Morphology and the Phylogeny of Goblin Spiders (Araneae, Oonopidae), with Notes on Basal Genera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oonopines are also usually easy to recognize by their rather stereotyped tarsal organ morphology (Platnick et al, 2012a); their tarsal organs are serially dimorphic, with three raised receptors on the anterior legs but only two raised receptors on the posterior legs and pedipalps. Perhaps the most obvious modifications of this general pattern occur within the complex of genera including Stenoonops Simon, Longoonops Platnick and Dupérré, Australoonops Hewitt, Scaphioides Bryant, Hortoonops Platnick and Dupérré, and Reductoonops Platnick and Berniker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oonopines are also usually easy to recognize by their rather stereotyped tarsal organ morphology (Platnick et al, 2012a); their tarsal organs are serially dimorphic, with three raised receptors on the anterior legs but only two raised receptors on the posterior legs and pedipalps. Perhaps the most obvious modifications of this general pattern occur within the complex of genera including Stenoonops Simon, Longoonops Platnick and Dupérré, Australoonops Hewitt, Scaphioides Bryant, Hortoonops Platnick and Dupérré, and Reductoonops Platnick and Berniker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as in the similar examples detailed in Platnick et al (2011) for Brignolia Dumitresco and Georgesco and in Platnick et al (2012a) for Orchestina Simon, Saaristo provided no putative synapomorphies uniting all the relevant species other than I. jivani and hence supporting the placement of that species as the sister group of all the others. We know of no such characters; Saaristo's artificial, monotypic genus is therefore positively misleading phylogenetically, and is here placed in synonymy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The sperm duct in the bulbus of Tapinesthis has a thin-walled part, but the distal part is still clearly sclerotized. However, this structure cannot be considered identical to the sclerotized duct as found in Orchestina and the outgroups used in Platnick et al (2012); hence an intermediate state for this set-up would be necessary. The tarsal organ receptor pattern that gives the impression to be 4433 at a first glance turns out to be 3322, since the distalmost receptor appears to be bifid.…”
Section: Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a third subfamily, the monotypic Orchestininae, was added for the genus Orchestina (Chamberlin & Ivie 1942). In a recent paper, Platnick et al (2012) profoundly changed the subfamilial structure of the Oonopidae. The main characters they used were the structure of the tarsal organs and more precisely their number of receptors, the sclerotization of the spermduct in the male palp and the position of the eyes.…”
Section: Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%