2024
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2022.3183864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted-BEHRT: Deep Learning for Observational Causal Inference on Longitudinal Electronic Health Records

Abstract: Observational causal inference is useful for decisionmaking in medicine when randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are infeasible or nongeneralizable. However, traditional approaches do not always deliver unconfounded causal conclusions in practice. The rise of "doubly robust" nonparametric tools coupled with the growth of deep learning for capturing rich representations of multimodal data offers a unique opportunity to develop and test such models for causal inference on comprehensive electronic health records (E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as previously reported, when such rich data are provided, the unsupervised learning component (masked EHR modeling) of the T-BEHRT model works well in reducing bias in estimation. 9 When data are sparse or limited (finite sample), the doubly-robust estimation, with known benefits for finite-sample estimation, more accurately estimates RR than the variants without utilization of doubly-robust estimation. 20 Furthermore, when positivity (overlap) between exposure groups is limited, the T-BEHRT model fares better than other benchmark models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, as previously reported, when such rich data are provided, the unsupervised learning component (masked EHR modeling) of the T-BEHRT model works well in reducing bias in estimation. 9 When data are sparse or limited (finite sample), the doubly-robust estimation, with known benefits for finite-sample estimation, more accurately estimates RR than the variants without utilization of doubly-robust estimation. 20 Furthermore, when positivity (overlap) between exposure groups is limited, the T-BEHRT model fares better than other benchmark models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the deep learning approach, we used Targeted Bidirectional Electronic Health Records Transformer (T-BEHRT) for risk ratio (RR) estimation of association between SBP and cardiovascular outcomes with SBP of <120 mm Hg considered as reference group. 9 For each of these comparisons, T-BEHRT was first trained to jointly predict exposure category (propensity score) and risk of outcome with 5-fold cross-validation implemented for training and testing. 19 The T-BEHRT model incorporated all recorded diagnoses and medications in medical history prior to study entry in addition to baseline smoking status (current, former, and never a smoker)—identified by last known status in the 12 months before baseline—and sex.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 8-10 With the availability of comprehensive electronic health records (EHR) and the advancement of deep learning (DL) causal modelling, the opportunity for more accurate modelling of associations among subgroups with poorer health has arisen. [10][11][12] While traditional modelling requires manual confounder selection, DL approaches such as Targeted Bidirectional EHR Transformer (T-BEHRT) automatically extract latent features that are confounding the association and more accurately estimate risk ratio (RR) in observational settings. 10 12 In this study, we applied the T-BEHRT model to evaluate the association between SBP and risk of cardiovascular outcomes in a cohort of 39 602 patients with COPD.…”
Section: Cardiac Risk Factors and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%