2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tailoring ion exchange membranes to enable low osmotic water transport and energy efficient electrodialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental observations of osmotic swelling of liposomes support this view (Chabanon et al, 2017). Yet, it was estimated that the energy cost of transporting a water molecule across an intact membrane is prohibitively high at room temperature (Porada et al, 2018), and hence the likely mechanism of water transfer is via transient pores as suggested earlier (Volkov et al, 1997). The results of our simulations are consistent with this latter view.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Experimental observations of osmotic swelling of liposomes support this view (Chabanon et al, 2017). Yet, it was estimated that the energy cost of transporting a water molecule across an intact membrane is prohibitively high at room temperature (Porada et al, 2018), and hence the likely mechanism of water transfer is via transient pores as suggested earlier (Volkov et al, 1997). The results of our simulations are consistent with this latter view.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The salt permeance of the IEMs varied by ~2.5 orders of magnitude, from 0.002-0.5 L.m -2 .hr -1 (Figure 3a and 3b, empty bars, Table S2). This range of values is consistent with data reported by Porada et al 21 for lab-prepared IEMs based on FAS and FKE polymer solutions (0.003-0.025 L.m -2 .hr -1 ). Similarly to the results for water permeance, CEMs generally had higher salt permeance than AEMs, but the contrast between CEMs and AEMs was greater than that seen for water permeance.…”
Section: Salt Permeancesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…10,17 Because neither osmosis nor salt diffusion responds to electric fields, both have a detrimental effect on the energy or separation efficiency of electrochemical processes such as electrodialysis (ED) and reverse electrodialysis (RED). 12, [18][19][20][21] Osmosis and salt diffusion both lower the salt concentration in the concentrated feed, which in ED compromises separation, and in RED causes uncontrolled mixing (i.e., mixing that does not produce electricity, Figure 1). The magnitude of the effects of water and salt transport on efficiency depends on both the process (ED, RED, energy storage, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zlotorowicz et al [11] described experiments on the reverse electrodialysis of aqueous solutions of NaCl in terms of thermodynamics of irreversible processes, which allowed them to relate the permselectivity of an ion-exchange membrane to the salt and water transport numbers and the molality of solutions on both sides of the membrane. Porada et al [12], likewise, experimentally studied osmotic and electroosmotic water transport in the case of electrodialysis through specially prepared reinforced polymer cation-and anion-exchange membranes [12]. They showed that the use of a mesh inside such membranes can reduce osmotic water transport because of a decrease in surface area and a weaker membrane swelling.…”
Section: Model Testing and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%