2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2777657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tail Protection for Long Investors: Trend Convexity at Work

Abstract: The performance of trend following strategies can be ascribed to the difference between long-term and short-term realized variance. We revisit this general result and show that it holds for various definitions of trend strategies. This explains the positive convexity of the aggregate performance of Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) which -when adequately measured -turns out to be much stronger than anticipated. We also highlight interesting connections with so-called Risk Parity portfolios. Finally, we propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 As is well known, trend following strategies offer an hedge against market drawdowns (see e.g. [19]); value strategies offer a hedge against over-exploited trends. As a consequence, we find that mixing both strategies significantly improves the profitability of the resulting portfolios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 As is well known, trend following strategies offer an hedge against market drawdowns (see e.g. [19]); value strategies offer a hedge against over-exploited trends. As a consequence, we find that mixing both strategies significantly improves the profitability of the resulting portfolios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in that case, the transaction cost factor can only explain a small fraction of abnormal returns of trend-followers. Finally, Lempérière et al (2017) show that the trend-following strategy has a positive skewness, which is at odds with the interpretation of trend excess returns as a risk premium of sorts (see also Dao et al (2017)).…”
Section: Interpretations Of the Trend And Value Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, macroeconomic variables such as the business cycle, or consumption, have been rejected as potential risk variables to explain it (Griffin et al, 2003;Asness et al, 2013). 4 Moskowitz et al (2012) and Dao et al (2017) show that the trendfollowing strategy performs best when the price experiences large up and down moves, which rules out the possibility that the trend effect is a compensation for crash risk or tail events. The most plausible evidence of a link between risk and trend-following returns is illiquidity risk (Pástor and Stambaugh, 2003;Sadka, 2006;Moskowitz et al, 2012).…”
Section: Interpretations Of the Trend And Value Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is a synthesis of these two. More recently Dao [5] focuses on the connection between convexity, option-like characteristics, and momentum strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An incidental conclusion from reading [5] is that the SG CTA index is very easily replicated, giving the lie to the contentions, blithely trotted out by the CTA industry, that barriers to entry are so high, that the subject can only be understood by those with years of experience, that a cohort of PhDs are required to build strategies, and that proprietary execution algorithms are importantthe last of these is clearly nonsense given the low speed at which the replicating strategy in [5] trades (see Figure 7 in that paper). In fact, rather than clever trade execution being important for momentum strategies, it is the reverse that is true: momentum is an important ingredient in trade execution, as over short time scales many financial time series exhibit momentum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%