2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1174-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling the learning curve: comparison between the anterior, minimally invasive (Micro-hip®) and the lateral, transgluteal (Bauer) approach for primary total hip replacement

Abstract: Consistent with recent meta-analysis we found reduced blood loss, similar clinical/radiographic outcome and similar complication rates compared to standard THA. Our study shows, that MI THR is a safe procedure during the learning curve of an experienced surgeon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
38
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, decreased weight loading is associated with muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration [20,11,21]. It is known that a different amount of traumatic injury occurs depending on the surgical approach that is chosen in patients with THA [10,22,23,7]. A recent report showed compensatory hypertrophy of the tensor fasciae latae muscle in patients with the lateral approach, when compared to the anterolateral approach in THA patients, due to increased muscle trauma to the gluteus medius [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, decreased weight loading is associated with muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration [20,11,21]. It is known that a different amount of traumatic injury occurs depending on the surgical approach that is chosen in patients with THA [10,22,23,7]. A recent report showed compensatory hypertrophy of the tensor fasciae latae muscle in patients with the lateral approach, when compared to the anterolateral approach in THA patients, due to increased muscle trauma to the gluteus medius [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently some less invasive modifications have been described and compared to the standard approaches such as Kocher-Langenbeck (dorsal), Bauer or Hardinge (lateral), Watson-Jones (anterolateral) and Smith-Peterson (anterior). All of them seem to have several advantages and every modification leads to different new problems [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Als Vorteile werden neben dem kosmetisch ansprechenden kleinen Hautschnitt besonders ein geringeres Gewebe-und Muskeltrauma mit geringerem Blutverlust und weniger postoperativen Schmerzen sowie zügigerer Rekonvaleszenz angegeben [4,11,24,25]. Befür-worter der Standardzugänge halten dem eine verlängerte Operationsdauer, erschwerte Wundheilung, zusätzliche Gefäß-und Nervenschäden und vorrangig eine schwierigere Implantatpositionierung mit erhöhtem Risiko der Implantatfehllage aufgrund verminderter Einsehbarkeit entgegen [1,13,32].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified