2016
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems toxicology of chemically induced liver and kidney injuries: histopathology‐associated gene co‐expression modules

Abstract: Organ injuries caused by environmental chemical exposures or use of pharmaceutical drugs pose a serious health risk that may be difficult to assess because of a lack of non‐invasive diagnostic tests. Mapping chemical injuries to organ‐specific histopathology outcomes via biomarkers will provide a foundation for designing precise and robust diagnostic tests. We identified co‐expressed genes (modules) specific to injury endpoints using the Open Toxicogenomics Project‐Genomics Assisted Toxicity Evaluation System … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have developed 8 kidney and 11 liver injury modules, which are co-expressed gene sets (modules) associated with specific histopathological injury phenotypes in the liver and kidney ( Te et al, 2016 ). The number of co-expressed genes in each injury module ranges from 8 to 126, with a total of 629 unique genes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have developed 8 kidney and 11 liver injury modules, which are co-expressed gene sets (modules) associated with specific histopathological injury phenotypes in the liver and kidney ( Te et al, 2016 ). The number of co-expressed genes in each injury module ranges from 8 to 126, with a total of 629 unique genes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the selection of injury-specific modules was partly based on biological information and the presence of known biomarkers. Recently, we developed an unbiased protocol to assign injury modules to specific histopathological injuries in the liver and kidney based on gene co-expression profiles ( Te et al, 2016 ). This protocol is applicable for any organ and has an advantage over, e.g., gene signatures, in that no biological or mechanistic information is needed as input other than gene expression data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the 8 kidney-and 11 liver-injury modules we identified and evaluated in previous work [18,19]. Several injury phenotypes may coexist, such as cellular infiltration and bile duct proliferation, which are early injury responses.…”
Section: Analysis Of Injury-module Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using gene expression data from the Open Toxicogenomics Project-Genomics Assisted Toxicity Evaluation System (TG-GATEs) database, which contains data from Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to different chemicals for 4 to 29 days [17], we derived 11 and 8 chemical-induced injury modules (i.e., gene modules, each uniquely associated with a specific organ-injury phenotype) for the liver and kidney, respectively, based on the histopathological injury phenotypes documented in the same database [18]. In a subsequent study, we validated these injury modules in vivo by treating Sprague-Dawley rats with thioacetamide [19], an organosulfur compound extensively used in animal studies as a fibrosis-promoting liver toxicant [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable effort has been invested applying transcript profiling to risk assessment using methodologies such as gene signatures, 12 pathway-based enrichment analysis, 13 co-expression networks, 14,15 and adverse outcome pathways. 16 However, toxicogenomic approaches to safety testing remain challenging and have achieved only modest utility in addressing uncertainty in safety predictions, largely as an investigative tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%