2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic risk in banking networks: Advantages of “tiered” banking systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors …nd that scale-free networks are more vulnerable because of (a) sub-optimal liquidity allocation, and (b) higher heterogeneity among participants which increases the exposure of the banking system to contagion. Teteryatnikova (2012) assesses the advantages of multi-tier systems …nding that the resilience of the banking network to systemic shocks increases with the level of tiering.…”
Section: Complex Banking Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors …nd that scale-free networks are more vulnerable because of (a) sub-optimal liquidity allocation, and (b) higher heterogeneity among participants which increases the exposure of the banking system to contagion. Teteryatnikova (2012) assesses the advantages of multi-tier systems …nding that the resilience of the banking network to systemic shocks increases with the level of tiering.…”
Section: Complex Banking Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anand et al (2012) address the heavy reliance on short-term wholesale funding markets in a vastly and increasingly connected financial system during the global financial crisis of 2007/2008, leading to a dramatic increase in rollover risk at the system level. Further studies focus on the interbank credit network structure and the financial linkages between banks, often applying agent-based simulations (Krause and Giansante, 2012;Teteryatnikova, 2014;Bech et al, 2015;Capponi and Chen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars studied the stability of the banking system with scale-free network or core-edge network. Among them, Krause and Giansante [7], Teteryatnikova [8] and Sui et al [9] studied it under the scale-free network, Borgatti and Everett [10] and Lux [11] studied the core-edge network. Krause and Giansante [7] simulated interbank network with different scale-free parameters, their study suggested that the smaller the interbank scale-free parameter and the higher the degree of concentration, the smaller the possibility of contagion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krause and Giansante [7] simulated interbank network with different scale-free parameters, their study suggested that the smaller the interbank scale-free parameter and the higher the degree of concentration, the smaller the possibility of contagion. Teteryatnikova [8] simulated the banking system under special shocks caused by operational risk or credit risk using two methods: heterodyne network and scale-free network. The research showed that as long as the highly connected banks were fully capitalized, the risk of systemic crisis and the scope of crisis in the banking system were both low, and the resilience of scale-free network to contagion increased with the level of tiering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%