2012
DOI: 10.37119/ojs2010.v16i1.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Changes in Higher Education

Abstract: A power shift is occurring in higher education, driven by two trends: (a) the increased freedom of learners to access, create, and re-create content; and (b) the opportunity for learners to interact with each other outside of a mediating agent. Information access and dialogue, previously under control of the educator, can now be readily fulfilled by learners. When the essential mandate of universities is buffeted by global, social/political, technological, and educational change pressures, questions abo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To name a few, such topics have included everything from artificial intelligence to digitalization, future learning paradigms, globalization, marketization, microcredentials, and workforce skills development (Aoun, 2017;Cormier et al, 2019;Facer, 2011;Future Skills Council, 2020;Macdonald, 2019;Macgilchrist et al, 2020;Selwyn et al, 2020). Intertwined with scholarship examining the role of technology in the future of education are discussions about the ways in which social, political, cultural, and economic forces are shaping higher education (Barber et al, 2020;Brown et al, 2020;Siemens & Matheos, 2010;Tierney, 2020). The relationships between higher education and these forces are complex and Facer (2011, p. 14) urges researchers and practitioners "to rewrite the relationship between education, socio-technical change and the future if we are to ensure that socio-technical changes of the next two decades do not simply serve to produce futures of profound inequality and environmental degradation.…”
Section: Review Of the Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To name a few, such topics have included everything from artificial intelligence to digitalization, future learning paradigms, globalization, marketization, microcredentials, and workforce skills development (Aoun, 2017;Cormier et al, 2019;Facer, 2011;Future Skills Council, 2020;Macdonald, 2019;Macgilchrist et al, 2020;Selwyn et al, 2020). Intertwined with scholarship examining the role of technology in the future of education are discussions about the ways in which social, political, cultural, and economic forces are shaping higher education (Barber et al, 2020;Brown et al, 2020;Siemens & Matheos, 2010;Tierney, 2020). The relationships between higher education and these forces are complex and Facer (2011, p. 14) urges researchers and practitioners "to rewrite the relationship between education, socio-technical change and the future if we are to ensure that socio-technical changes of the next two decades do not simply serve to produce futures of profound inequality and environmental degradation.…”
Section: Review Of the Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent teacher trends have emphasized the importance of learning with technology instead of learning about technology (Li, 2003). One of the new technological advances that are widely used in the classroom today is a Smart Board to increase a student's knowledge and motivation (Rakes, Flowers, Casey, & Santana, 2006;Siemens & Matheos, 2010;Knezek, Christensen, Bell, & Bell, 2006). The technological capabilities of the Smart Board and its accompanying software are very compelling to students, effectively engaging them in the learning content.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education in the 21 st century has witnessed a major paradigm shift. A number of factors ranging from global dynamics, curricula changes such as the ongoing shift towards competency-based curriculum, economic, political, social, cultural, technological, and labour market aspects have all prompted these changes (Palloff & Pratt, 2013;Siemens & Matheos, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%