Systematisation of effectiveness indicators for international economic integration

Aldokhina, T. P.

doi:10.21003/ea.v164-06

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a part of the EAEU integration, the processes of common markets formation have been successfully started. Despite of criticism and doubts of some experts concerning success of integration processes in the EAEU region (Kirkham, 2016;Aldokhina, 2017;Perskaya, 2020), the data obtained on the first results of regional union work (Telegina et al, 2019) indicates the development prospects of the EUEA.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential and Development Prospects Assessment of Electric Power Integration of the Eurasian Economic Union Countries

Navrotskaia¹,

Sopilko²,

Myasnikova³

et al. 2020

IJEEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Existing approaches to the analysis of countries economic integration processes in international practice are investigated in the paper. Evaluating methodology of the long-term integration processes in the electric power sector is offered for the EAEU countries in three scenarios: High, low and medium, based on the synergy of various economic and mathematical methods. The actual methodology is formed in accordance with special macroeconomic scenario conditions and includes the final energy consumption forecast with division by the types of energy sources in the context of consumers categories of the EAEU countries based on generated scenario conditions using econometric methods (growth curves, Cobb-Douglas production function, regression analysis, simulation methods), as well as the development forecast of electric power industry concerning the EAEU countries reasoning from perspective dynamics of generating capacities of these countries. Project growth of electric power sector development founded on suggested method was made for the EAEU countries for the period of 2018-2040, specifically, electricity consumption projection, electricity consumption increasing, as well as capacity increasing of NPGS, HEP and RER in these countries. The necessity of further efforts to develop the common electric power market in the EAEU countries in order to obtain possible long-term integration effects are emphasized.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential and Development Prospects Assessment of Electric Power Integration of the Eurasian Economic Union Countries

Navrotskaia¹,

Sopilko²,

Myasnikova³

et al. 2020

IJEEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…T. P. Aldohina uses an integrated approach to assess the effectiveness of integration processes (on the example of the EEU). In the study, she offers a system of statistical indicators that allow making a comprehensive assessment of the socio-economic consequences for the EEU member countries [11].…”

Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consequences of the integration to the Eurasian Economic Union: methodology of statistical evaluation and first results

Тихонова¹,

Melnikova²,

Lukács³

2018

EA-XXI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study represents an assessment of socioeconomic integration consequences within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) for the participating countries-Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia. The authors implemented a personally developed approach of integral efficiency evaluation based on the calculation of the coefficients of state social and economic development indicators of growth as a main method for such assessment. These indicators allow us to characterise the following segments: national welfare, inflation, investment activity, labour market and the level of poverty, and the condition of the main economic sectors. The authors determined that Russia is the only export-oriented member of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). The worst consequences of integration in the cross-border trade sphere are observed in Belarus. For the analysed countries (excluding Kyrgyzstan), the first year of the existence of the EEU can be characterised as a period of economic recession (2015). According to the comparison of integral rates for the periods of 2005-2014 and 2015-2017, it was defined that the integration had a positive economic effect in the short term. By now, all the five participating countries have achieved the same level of social and economic development as in the pre-crisis period (2012-2013). In terms of the EEU membership, the calculated economic growth expands from 3% in Kyrgyzstan (by the integral index) up to 30% in the Republic of Belarus. Russia has also significantly strengthened its position (the growth rate of the index in 2015-17 was 25%).

show abstract

Systematisation of effectiveness indicators for international economic integration

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Potential and Development Prospects Assessment of Electric Power Integration of the Eurasian Economic Union Countries

Potential and Development Prospects Assessment of Electric Power Integration of the Eurasian Economic Union Countries

Consequences of the integration to the Eurasian Economic Union: methodology of statistical evaluation and first results

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About