2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of the treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption comparing number of tunnels and graft type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 3 Another recent review found a statistically significant re-operation rate when allograft was used. 9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 Another recent review found a statistically significant re-operation rate when allograft was used. 9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,14,19 Distal clavicle or coracoid process fractures represent rare complications after CC ligament procedures. A recent systematic review by Pill et al 20 identified 17 postoperative fractures within a population of 460 patients (3.7% fracture rate). Additionally, those authors noted that clavicle fractures represented the most common reason for revision surgery within their study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study found that significantly more patients in the two-bundle group experienced good to excellent outcomes based on modified UCLA rating score than their single bundle group (70% vs 18%, P > .99). However, Pill et al 14 performed a systematic review of treatments for AC joint disruption comparing the number of tunnels and found that patients in the double tunnel group experienced significantly more adverse events, which included clavicle and coracoid fractures. This is likely due to the increased number of drill holes and stress risers leading to an increased failure rate of the clavicle and coracoid fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Pill et al. 14 performed a systematic review of treatments for AC joint disruption comparing the number of tunnels and found that patients in the double tunnel group experienced significantly more adverse events, which included clavicle and coracoid fractures. This is likely due to the increased number of drill holes and stress risers leading to an increased failure rate of the clavicle and coracoid fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%