2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep30780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of nasal potential difference in hypoxia-induced lung injury

Abstract: Nasal potential difference (NPD), a well-established in vivo clinical test for cystic fibrosis, reflects transepithelial cation and anion transport in the respiratory epithelium. To analyze whether NPD can be applied to diagnose hypoxic lung injury, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google Scholar, and analyzed data retrieved from eleven unbiased studies for high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) using the software RevMan and R. There wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These formulas were widely acknowledged and used in other meta-analysis. 117 , 118 Fourth, on the basis of NOS criteria, the differences between two factors, involving gender ratio and mean age, had reduced the comparability between MS patients and controls in a majority of included studies. 14 These limits highlight the need for continued investigations into the NFL levels in MS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These formulas were widely acknowledged and used in other meta-analysis. 117 , 118 Fourth, on the basis of NOS criteria, the differences between two factors, involving gender ratio and mean age, had reduced the comparability between MS patients and controls in a majority of included studies. 14 These limits highlight the need for continued investigations into the NFL levels in MS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So we used a series of formulas to infer and calculate the mean and SD from the published sample size, median, range or inter-quartile range. These formulas were widely acknowledged and used in other meta-analysis [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw data of each sub-group at admission were extracted by ZLS and RZZ. Individual data of case series 2,32 , median and interquartile range 1,4-8, 13,33-47 , and ranges of median or mean 9,48,49 were converted to SDM as described previously 50,51 . Percentages and SDMs were extracted directly from studies if available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%