Systematic Analysis of Literature on the Healthcare Financial Models to Follow in Russia and Romania

Abstract

This paper aims at finding the suitable healthcare financial model, focusing on their pros and cons, as debated by several scholars. The focus is on the potential benefits for both Romanian and Russian healthcare systems. To reach this goal, a systematic review of the literature was conducted, and various competitive advantages and disadvantages of the financial models were extracted. We reviewed 77 papers published during the last 21 years that were found in famous scientific databases. The main findings of the research point out that the financing of healthcare systems should be based on hybrid sources, and the funds raised should be better invested in order to create added value. By assuring a proper financing, the population’s quality of life will improve and life expectancy will increase. This paper provides a new viewpoint to the problem because it reviews certain papers from Russian literature which are not usually included in the review articles. The research results have implications for the government, medical community, and academia, which should work together to strengthen the healthcare system.

Assessing Customer Satisfaction to Support Future Improvement Strategies of Healthcare Systems: Evidences from Russia and Romania

“…A potential "hybrid" model combining elements of different approaches taken from the experience of developed EU countries and fully private models such as the US could be suitable for the two countries. But a "hybrid" model also has its drawbacks such as the novelty, uncertainty, vagueness, and inconsistency of its elements during the transition from the present models [45]. In addition, there are large differences between the healthcare services offered in urban and rural areas, with major accessibility problems for rural residents [46].…”

Assessing Customer Satisfaction to Support Future Improvement Strategies of Healthcare Systems: Evidences from Russia and Romania

“…A potential "hybrid" model combining elements of different approaches taken from the experience of developed EU countries and fully private models such as the US could be suitable for the two countries. But a "hybrid" model also has its drawbacks such as the novelty, uncertainty, vagueness, and inconsistency of its elements during the transition from the present models [45]. In addition, there are large differences between the healthcare services offered in urban and rural areas, with major accessibility problems for rural residents [46].…”

Assessing Customer Satisfaction to Support Future Improvement Strategies of Healthcare Systems: Evidences from Russia and Romania

“…A potential "hybrid" model combining elements of different approaches taken from the experience of developed EU countries and fully private models such as the US could be suitable for the two countries. But a "hybrid" model also has its drawbacks such as the novelty, uncertainty, vagueness, and inconsistency of its elements during the transition from the present models [45]. In addition, there are large differences between the healthcare services offered in urban and rural areas, with major accessibility problems for rural residents [46].…”

Assessing Customer Satisfaction to Support Future Improvement Strategies of Healthcare Systems: Evidences from Russia and Romania

“…A potential "hybrid" model combining elements of different approaches taken from the experience of developed EU countries and fully private models such as the US could be suitable for the two countries. But a "hybrid" model also has its drawbacks such as the novelty, uncertainty, vagueness, and inconsistency of its elements during the transition from the present models [45]. In addition, there are large differences between the healthcare services offered in urban and rural areas, with major accessibility problems for rural residents [46].…”