System Dynamics Modeling in the Evaluation of Delays of Care in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients within a Tiered Health System

Abstract

BackgroundMortality rates amongst ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients remain high, especially in developing countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors related with delays in the treatment of STEMI patients to support a strategic plan toward structural and personnel modifications in a primary hospital aligning its process with international guidelines.Methods and FindingsThe study was conducted in a primary hospital localized in Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil. We utilized a qualitative and quantitative integrated analysis including on-site observations, interviews, medical records analysis, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and System Dynamics Modeling (SD). Main cause of delays were categorized into three themes: a) professional, b) equipment and c) transportation logistics. QCA analysis confirmed four main stages of delay to STEMI patient’s care in relation to the ‘Door-in-Door-out’ time at the primary hospital. These stages and their average delays in minutes were: a) First Medical Contact (From Door-In to the first contact with the nurse and/or physician): 7 minutes; b) Electrocardiogram acquisition and review by a physician: 28 minutes; c) ECG transmission and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Center team feedback time: 76 minutes; and d) Patient’s Transfer Waiting Time: 78 minutes. SD baseline model confirmed the system’s behavior with all occurring delays and the need of improvements. Moreover, after model validation and sensitivity analysis, results suggested that an overall improvement of 40% to 50% in each of these identified stages would reduce the delay.ConclusionsThis evaluation suggests that investment in health personnel training, diminution of bureaucracy, and management of guidelines might lead to important improvements decreasing the delay of STEMI patients’ care. In addition, this work provides evidence that SD modeling may highlight areas where health system managers can implement and evaluate the necessary changes in order to improve the process of care.

Acute care for the three leading causes of mortality in lower-middle-income countries: A systematic review

“…A study in Brazil in a tiered healthcare setting found an average delay of 28 min from provider to EKG obtainment and another average 153 min for the percutaneous intervention (PCI) center to review the EKG and get the patient transferred. [ 18 ] In India, an electronic Intensive Care Unit (eICU) was established whereby EKGs were obtained and transmitted and interpreted by remote cardiologists, who made treatment recommendations resulting in the mean door to needle time of 30 min versus 180 min before eICU with a reduction of >70% in mortality. [ 19 ] Although IHD patients can be managed in a general medical ward, a specific cardiac unit may give evidence-based treatments more consistently and promptly.…”

A System Dynamics Simulation Applied to Healthcare: A Systematic Review

“…The average simulation time among the selected papers is 32.4 years, although a study by de Andrade and associates [ 78 ] used 1440 min as the simulation time in an SD model. The main scenarios of the included papers are changes in the intervals and intensity of treatments and therapies, stage-specific survival rates, patients and population size, adopting different levels of programs and interventions, and the existence of other conditions such as obesity.…”

Towards Personalization of Diabetes Therapy Using Computerized Decision Support and Machine Learning: Some Open Problems and Challenges

“…CDSS support the medical decision making process in diagnostics, therapeutics and prognostics in main medical disciplines [74]. Typical CDSS applications can be found for example in radiology, emergency medicine and intensive care, cardiovascular medicine, internal medicine or oncology [85][86][87][88][89][90][91].…”