2018
Synthesis and spectroscopic study of transition metal complexes of tridentate ligand formed by direct condensation of o-vanillin and 2-aminophenol: X-ray structural characterization of the zinc(II) complex
Abstract: The reactions of the Schiff base 2-((2-hydroxyphenylimino)methyl)-6-methoxyphenol (H2L), obtained by direct condensation of 2-aminophenol and 2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde, with some transition metal ions (Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II)) afforded complexes of general formulae [M2(L)2(solvent)x] (M: Mn, Co, Ni, Cu or Zn; Solvent: DMSO or H2O). These compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, UV-Vis, IR, 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopies, molar conductivity and room temperature magnetic measu…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
5
3
2
1
Citation Types
0
10
0
1
Year Published
2021
2024
Publication Types
Select...
9
Relationship
1
8
Authors
Journals
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
References 38 publications
0
10
0
1
“…On the other hand, signals that show up in the 7.5–7.9 ppm region are thought to be aromatic proton (Ar‐H). Additionally, the singlet signal seen at δ 8.75 ppm suggests the involvement of imine proton in hydrogen bond interaction 43 . The peaks’ positions showed a lack of unique signals in the ligand between 2.4 and 2.9 ppm, which is explained by the amine group’s deprotonation during the azomethine bond formation, confirming the production of the Schiff base ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand, signals that show up in the 7.5–7.9 ppm region are thought to be aromatic proton (Ar‐H). Additionally, the singlet signal seen at δ 8.75 ppm suggests the involvement of imine proton in hydrogen bond interaction 43 . The peaks’ positions showed a lack of unique signals in the ligand between 2.4 and 2.9 ppm, which is explained by the amine group’s deprotonation during the azomethine bond formation, confirming the production of the Schiff base ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand, signals that show up in the 7.53–7.89 ppm region are thought to be aromatic proton (Ar‐H). Additionally, the singlet signal seen at δ 8.65 ppm suggests the involvement of amine proton in hydrogen bond interaction [67, 68]. The peaks’ positions showed a lack of unique signals in the ligand between 2.4 and 2.9 ppm, which is explained by the amine group’s deprotonation during the azomethine bond formation, confirming the production of the Schiff base ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N [ 30 ]. A low intensity band between 3080 and 3000 cm −1 represents aromatic ν (C–H) [ 31 ]. There is a sharp peak at 1664 cm −1 which is due to the presence of C = 0 group of the ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
