2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of SBA-16 type mesoporous materials containing amine groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, most SBA-16 particles exhibited an irregular shape (Fig. 2b) similar to the morphology found by Feliczak-guzik et al (2016) (Feliczak-guzik et al, 2016). The maximum Feret diameter of SBA-16 particles was between 5 and 10 µm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, most SBA-16 particles exhibited an irregular shape (Fig. 2b) similar to the morphology found by Feliczak-guzik et al (2016) (Feliczak-guzik et al, 2016). The maximum Feret diameter of SBA-16 particles was between 5 and 10 µm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These data demonstrate that there was a reduction in surface area and pore volume, thus confirming the presence of Rutin on silica (i.e. SBET, DP and VP of 806 m 2 •g −1 , 6.6 nm, 0.60 cm 3 •g −1 ) to SBA-16 [14] [24]. The comparison between the DP of SBA-16 and…”
Section: Physicochemical and Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The M1 sample showed higher textural parameter values as compared to those reported in [26], with A BET =795 m 2 .g -1 , V p =0.99 cm 3 .g -1 , and D BJH =6 nm, demonstrating optimal conditions for obtaining the SBA-15 mesoporous structure. The values of the textural parameters described in [27] for the SBA-16 structure indicated that the values obtained for A BET = 858 and 711 m 2 .g -1 , V p = 1.06 and 1.35 cm 3 .g -1 and D BJH = 5 and 7 nm for samples M2 and M5, respectively, were consistent with the literature. The samples M3 and M4 had the best surface area results of the synthesized structures, 1074 and 1075 m 2 .g -1 , respectively, and, in comparison to the other samples, they showed a tendency that samples with smaller pores presented bigger surface areas and vice-versa.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%