1995
DOI: 10.1021/ic00118a024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and Characterization of Polymeric Ag(I)-Telluroether and Cu(I)-Diorganyl Ditelluride Complexes: Crystal Structures of [Ag(MeTe(CH2)3TeMe)2]n[BF4]n, [(.mu.2-MeTeTeMe)Cu(.mu.-Cl)]n, and [Ag2(NCCH3)4(.mu.2-(p-C6H4F)TeTe(p-C6H4F))2][BF4]2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Te–Te distance in 2c (3.33 Å) is much shorter and indicates a relatively strong intermolecular Te–Te bonding interaction with the formation of dimeric species. It is longer than typical Te–Te single bond lengths between two-coordinate Te atoms or in coordination compounds of ditellanes (∼2.7 Å, Te ∞ , Me-Te-Te-Me, (CO) 5 M←(H 5 C 6 )­Te-Te­(C 6 H 5 )→M­(CO) 5 , M = Cr, W), , but significantly shorter than observed for typical closed-shell interactions. , Distances similar to those of 2c were found for bonds between three-coordinate Te atoms as in Mes 2 Te-Te­(I)­Mes or compounds with strained geometries. The bonding situation in these compounds is completely different from that of 2c . The short Te–Te distances in these cases are forced by an 1,8-position of the Te atoms on a naphthalene backbone or favored by electron-withdrawing iodine atoms bonded to Te or a cationic tellurium species in the bridging position between two Te atoms .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The Te–Te distance in 2c (3.33 Å) is much shorter and indicates a relatively strong intermolecular Te–Te bonding interaction with the formation of dimeric species. It is longer than typical Te–Te single bond lengths between two-coordinate Te atoms or in coordination compounds of ditellanes (∼2.7 Å, Te ∞ , Me-Te-Te-Me, (CO) 5 M←(H 5 C 6 )­Te-Te­(C 6 H 5 )→M­(CO) 5 , M = Cr, W), , but significantly shorter than observed for typical closed-shell interactions. , Distances similar to those of 2c were found for bonds between three-coordinate Te atoms as in Mes 2 Te-Te­(I)­Mes or compounds with strained geometries. The bonding situation in these compounds is completely different from that of 2c . The short Te–Te distances in these cases are forced by an 1,8-position of the Te atoms on a naphthalene backbone or favored by electron-withdrawing iodine atoms bonded to Te or a cationic tellurium species in the bridging position between two Te atoms .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[23] The AgÀ N bond lengths 2.363(6)/2.411(7) Å, 2.383(6)/2.449(6) Å are shorter than the reported acetonitrile coordinated telluroether silver complex 2.573(5)/2.253(4) Å. [24] The CuÀ Te and AgÀ Te bonds lengths are shorter than the sum of covalent radii [Cu = 1.38(4) Å, Ag = 1.45(5) Å, Te = 1.38(4) Å] of respective metal ions. In all the four complexes, the quinoline groups of the telluroether 3 have been conformationally reoriented.…”
Section: X-ray Crystallographic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly Liaw's group has reported an interesting silver complex which exhibited a chair conformation [24] . Recently, Lang and co‐workers have reported bis(2‐bypyridyl) ditellane I and its bimetallic copper complex (Figure 1) where copper ion adopted a tetrahedral geometry and tellurium atoms adopted trigonal pyramidal geometry [25] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations