2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis and characterization of La-doped Zn(O,S) photocatalyst for green chemical detoxification of 4-nitrophenol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And the porous structure, in which the multiple scattering of light could appear, would enhance the utilization of light of ATC‐P10 . The bandgap energy is obtained by the intercept method according to the formula Ahv = K ( hv – E g ) 2 , . Compared with P25 (3.3 eV) and ZTOF‐1‐P10 (3.0 eV), the band‐gap energy of the ATC‐P10 (Figure b) was calculated to be about 2.9 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the porous structure, in which the multiple scattering of light could appear, would enhance the utilization of light of ATC‐P10 . The bandgap energy is obtained by the intercept method according to the formula Ahv = K ( hv – E g ) 2 , . Compared with P25 (3.3 eV) and ZTOF‐1‐P10 (3.0 eV), the band‐gap energy of the ATC‐P10 (Figure b) was calculated to be about 2.9 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the specific surface area and porosity of the catalysts increase, more light will be received, and the porous structure can lead to multiple scattering of light and improve the utilization of light . According to the formula Ahν = K ( hν – E g ) 2 , the bandgaps of these samples were obtained by the intercept method. The bandgaps of PTC‐P6 (2.9 eV), PTC‐P8 (2.8 eV), PTC‐P10 (2.7 eV) and ZTOF‐1‐P10 (3.0 eV) are smaller than that of P25 (3.3 eV), while the bandgap of PTC‐P4 (3.4 eV) is larger than that of P25.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various other semiconductor catalysts such as Bi 4 O 5 Br x I 2-x (Meng et al 2018), PdO/Al 2 O 3 -Nd 2 O 3 (Balgude et al 2019), PF/TiO 2 (Li et al 2018), Sn 3 O 4 microballs, Fe 2 O 3 (Vosoughi et al 2017), La-doped Zn (O, S) nanoparticles (Abdullah et al 2019), B-GO-TiO 2 (Shokri et al 2016), Fe 2 O 3 /RGO nanocomposite (Mohan et al 2019), MoS 2 /rGO, CdS-MoS 2 /rGO composite (Peng et al 2016) have also been shown to be effective in the degradation of various petrochemicals. For the PCO process to be effective, several variables such as light intensity, amount of catalyst, temperature, pH, UV irradiation time, and initial pollutants concentration must be optimized (Shahrezaei et al 2012).…”
Section: Photocatalytic Oxidation (Pco)mentioning
confidence: 99%