2009
DOI: 10.1130/g25461a.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syndepositional fault control on lower Frasnian platform evolution, Lennard Shelf, Canning Basin, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Syn‐sedimentary faulting is considered to have been a major control on accommodation and the evolution of the Hull platform (George et al ., ). General facies patterns in the Hull platform indicate that the major controlling structure was the north‐trending Mount Elma–Painted Rocks fault system to the east (Fig.…”
Section: Overview Of the Hull Platformmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Syn‐sedimentary faulting is considered to have been a major control on accommodation and the evolution of the Hull platform (George et al ., ). General facies patterns in the Hull platform indicate that the major controlling structure was the north‐trending Mount Elma–Painted Rocks fault system to the east (Fig.…”
Section: Overview Of the Hull Platformmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…). The Hull platform is interpreted to have developed as a margin‐attached platform on a tilted basement block with differential subsidence and wedge‐shaped accommodation controlled by syn‐depositional faulting (George et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Hull platform (our collective term for Hull Range, Horse Spring Range and Guppy Hills) is important because it contains clear evidence of subaerial exposure and flooding events for which we have biostratigraphic control (microvertebrate and conodont biostratigraphy) to show that the entire platform succession is within Frasnian Zones 2-6 (George & Chow 1999;George et al 2009). This is in contrast to Hocking & Playford (2000) who considered Horse Spring Range and Guppy Hills to be largely Givetian.…”
Section: Hull Platform (Hull Range Guppy Hills and Horse Spring Range)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F/F crisis shows regionally different physical stratigraphical expression, e.g. : (i) deposition of the well‐known Kellwaser limestones and associated anoxic beds during the Upper rhenana and linguiformis zones (Sandberg et al ., , ; Wendt and Belka, ; Schindler, ; Lazreq, ; Tribovillard et al ., ; Bond and Wignall, , ; Bond et al ., ; Riquier et al ., , ; Pujol et al ., ; Navas‐Parejo et al ., ); (ii) gaps and/or sharp changes in the conodont record related to stratigraphic discontinuity surfaces such as hardgrounds, omission surfaces, karstification and drowning of carbonate platforms due to sea‐level or climatic changes and/or to regional tectonics (Rodríguez‐Cañero, ; George et al ., , ; Girard and Feist, ; Becker and House, ; Racki, , ; Veimarn et al ., ; Hallam and Wignall, ; Streel et al ., ; Devleeschouwer et al ., ; Racki et al ., ; Yudina et al ., ; Chow et al ., ; Averbuch et al ., ; Hocking et al ., ; Morrow and Sandberg, ; Matyja, ); (iii) redeposited beds related to mass flows, tsunamites and/or tempestites recorded during the Lower triangularis zone (Sandberg et al ., , ; Wang et al ., ; Wang, ; Racki, ; Yazdi, ; Du et al ., ); (iv) stable isotopic and other geochemical excursions, sometimes associated with magnetic susceptibility changes (Buggisch, ; Wang et al ., ; Joachimski and Buggisch, ; Nicoll and Playford, ; Girard and Albarède, ; Joachimski et al ., ; Crick et al ., ; Racki et al ., ; Stephens and Sumner, ; Buggisch and Joachimski, ; Pujol et al ., ; Riquier et al ., ; Savage et al ., ; Xu et al ., ); and (v) putative microtektites related to comet shower impacts around the F/F (Sandberg et al ., ; ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F/F crisis shows regionally different physical stratigraphical expression, e.g. : (i) deposition of the well-known Kellwaser limestones and associated anoxic beds during the Upper rhenana and linguiformis zones (Sandberg et al, 1988(Sandberg et al, , 2002Wendt and Belka, 1991;Schindler, 1993;Lazreq, 1999;Tribovillard et al, 2004;Wignall, 2005, 2008;Riquier et al, 2005Riquier et al, , 2006Pujol et al, 2006;Navas-Parejo et al, 2009); (ii) gaps and/or sharp changes in the conodont record related to stratigraphic discontinuity surfaces such as hardgrounds, omission surfaces, karstification and drowning of carbonate platforms due to sea-level or climatic changes and/or to regional tectonics (Rodr ıguez-Cañero, 1993a;George et al, 1995George et al, , 2009Girard and Feist, 1996;Becker and House, 1997;Racki, 1997Racki, , 1998Veimarn et al, 1997;Hallam and Wignall, 1999;Streel et al, 2000;Devleesc-houwer et al, 2002;Racki et al, 2002;Yudina et al, 2002;Chow et al, 2004;Averbuch et al, 2005;Hocking et al, 2008;Morrow and Sandberg, 2008;Matyja, 2009); (iii) redeposited beds related to mass flows, tsunamites and/or tempestites recorded during the Lower triangularis zone (Sandberg et al, 1988(Sandberg et al, , 2002Wang et al, 1991;Wang, 1994;Racki, 1999;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%