2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2009.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchrotron XPS studies of solution exposed chalcopyrite, bornite, and heterogeneous chalcopyrite with bornite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…structure. The reason behind the higher binding energy of 161.6 eV than that observed in the literature is the increased coordination number of S atom [60]. The additional contribution obtained at 162.8 eV represents the formation of polysulfide (S n 2 − , where 2 ≤ n ≤ 8) [61] which is generally observed in binding energy range between about 162.0 eV (disulfide) and 164.0 eV (elemental sulfur) [62].…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…structure. The reason behind the higher binding energy of 161.6 eV than that observed in the literature is the increased coordination number of S atom [60]. The additional contribution obtained at 162.8 eV represents the formation of polysulfide (S n 2 − , where 2 ≤ n ≤ 8) [61] which is generally observed in binding energy range between about 162.0 eV (disulfide) and 164.0 eV (elemental sulfur) [62].…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…13(d) consists of three doublets for Ti-CZTS. The S 2p 3/2 peaks at 160.6 eV [58] and 161.0 eV [59] indicate monosulfide whereas the other at 162.2 eV represents disulfide (S 2 2− ) [60]. ) structure.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop proper alternatives to avoid surface passivation and enhance the hydrometallurgical efficiency, various strategies, including surface-sensitive X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) synchrotron-based techniques [15][16][17][18] have been attempted to investigate the surface products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Harahsheh et al (2006) also found that, when chalcopyrite was in intimate contact with pyrite, it experienced an enhanced oxidation compared to when there was no contact with pyrite. Acres et al (2010) studied the oxidation and leaching of heterogeneous chalcopyrite with bornite by using Synchrotron X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (SXPS). It was found that the presence of bornite in intimate contact with chalcopyrite resulted in fewer hydrophobic polysulfide species and more hydrophilic sulphate species at the chalcopyrite surface after oxidation in flotation related conditions.…”
Section: Galvanic Interaction Between Different Sulphide Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doublet at 162.7 eV can be attributed to the formation of polysulphide from the oxidation of both sulphide minerals (Buckley andWoods 1984, Smart et al 1999). An energy loss (EL) feature has been fitted at approximately 164.1 eV, which is associated with S 3p to Fe 3d excitation (Harmer et al 2004, Acres et al 2010. Based on the type of surface oxidation species, the following reactions on chalcopyrite surfaces are proposed:…”
Section: Flotation Of Chalcopyritementioning
confidence: 99%