2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synchrotron X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of NaAlH4 containing Ti–Zr hydride additives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the canonical interpretation of the two broad features around 71–72 and 73–76 eV in Figure would assign the lower peaks to the Al 0 oxidation state (Al metal) and the higher peaks to Al 3+ species (Al hydrides and oxides). This interpretation was assumed by Delmelle et al and is widely reported in the literature. ,,, However, Na 3 AlH 6 conflicts with that interpretation since its computed binding energy is close to that of the Al metal. As a result, it should be difficult to distinguish between these two species within the lower-binding-energy feature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the canonical interpretation of the two broad features around 71–72 and 73–76 eV in Figure would assign the lower peaks to the Al 0 oxidation state (Al metal) and the higher peaks to Al 3+ species (Al hydrides and oxides). This interpretation was assumed by Delmelle et al and is widely reported in the literature. ,,, However, Na 3 AlH 6 conflicts with that interpretation since its computed binding energy is close to that of the Al metal. As a result, it should be difficult to distinguish between these two species within the lower-binding-energy feature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This interpretation was assumed by Delmelle et al and is widely reported in the literature. 30,38,43,44 However, Na 3 AlH 6 conflicts with that interpretation since its computed binding energy is close to that of the Al metal. As a result, it should be difficult to distinguish between these two species within the lowerbinding-energy feature.…”
Section: → + +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Na 3 AlH 6 photoelectron peak in Fig. 13(a-d) for the rehydrogenated samples, located at 64.92 eV, 57 further proves the reformation of Na 3 AlH 6 during the rehydrogenation process. These observations are in accordance with the results of X-ray diffraction, showing that the enhanced rehydriding capacity of the doped sample is induced by the reformation of Na 3 AlH 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This fact is further strengthened by the XPS spectra from the Mg 2p regions of the doped sample (Fig.12b), exhibiting the occurrence of MgO after first dehydrogenation. The Na 3 AlH 6 photoelectron peak in Fig.13(a-d) for the rehydrogenated samples, located at 64.92 eV,57 further proves the reformation of Na 3 AlH 6 during the rehydrogenation process. These observations are in accordance with the results of X-ray diffraction, showing that the enhanced rehydriding capacity of the doped sample is induced by the reformation of Na 3 AlH 6 .The FESEM qualitative and quantitative microstructural investigations have been employed to examine the particle size and morphology of the as-milled and cycled samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%