Abstract:We examined the synaptic organization of reciprocal connections between the temporal cortex and the dorsal (Pd) and central (Pc) subdivisions of the tree shrew pulvinar nucleus, regions innervated by the medial and lateral superior colliculus, respectively. Both Pd and Pc subdivisions project topographically to 2 separate regions of the temporal cortex; small injections of anterograde tracers placed in either Pd or Pc labeled 2 foci of terminals in the temporal cortex. Pulvinocortical pathways innervated layer… Show more
“…We compared the data collected in the present study to that collected in a previous study of pulvinocortical connections (Chomsung et al, 2010 We also found that the synapses formed by pulvinocortical terminals are more complex (perforated or multiple) than those formed by geniculocortical terminals, and whereas pulvinocortical terminals do not contact any GABAergic profiles, approximately 9% of geniculocortical terminals contact GABAergic profiles. Finally, we found that the horizontal orientation of layer IV geniculocortical terminals is quiet distinct from the more vertically oriented pulvinocortical terminals.…”
Section: Comparison Of Geniculocortical and Pulvinocortical Terminalsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We compared the features of the 311 geniculocortical synapses examined in this study to 444 pulvinocortical synapses examined in the previous study from our laboratory (Chomsung et al, 2010). The size of geniculocortical terminals (mean area 1.06 ± 0.58 µm 2 ) was significantly (p < .001) larger than the size of pulvinocortical terminals (0.51 ± 0.28 µm 2 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Synaptic Targets Of Geniculocortical Termimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…areas. Our previous study of the projections from the pulvinar nucleus to the temporal cortex in the tree shrew (Tupaia) revealed that pulvinocortical terminals innervate layers I-IV, where they all contact dendritic spines (Chomsung et al, 2010). The goal of the current study was to examine the ultrastructure of geniculocortical terminals in the tree shrew so that we could directly compare the characteristics of thalamocortical terminals in the striate and extrastriate cortex of the same species.…”
“…We compared the data collected in the present study to that collected in a previous study of pulvinocortical connections (Chomsung et al, 2010 We also found that the synapses formed by pulvinocortical terminals are more complex (perforated or multiple) than those formed by geniculocortical terminals, and whereas pulvinocortical terminals do not contact any GABAergic profiles, approximately 9% of geniculocortical terminals contact GABAergic profiles. Finally, we found that the horizontal orientation of layer IV geniculocortical terminals is quiet distinct from the more vertically oriented pulvinocortical terminals.…”
Section: Comparison Of Geniculocortical and Pulvinocortical Terminalsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We compared the features of the 311 geniculocortical synapses examined in this study to 444 pulvinocortical synapses examined in the previous study from our laboratory (Chomsung et al, 2010). The size of geniculocortical terminals (mean area 1.06 ± 0.58 µm 2 ) was significantly (p < .001) larger than the size of pulvinocortical terminals (0.51 ± 0.28 µm 2 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Synaptic Targets Of Geniculocortical Termimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…areas. Our previous study of the projections from the pulvinar nucleus to the temporal cortex in the tree shrew (Tupaia) revealed that pulvinocortical terminals innervate layers I-IV, where they all contact dendritic spines (Chomsung et al, 2010). The goal of the current study was to examine the ultrastructure of geniculocortical terminals in the tree shrew so that we could directly compare the characteristics of thalamocortical terminals in the striate and extrastriate cortex of the same species.…”
“…In general, the tectorecipient pulvinar subdivisions receive afferent projections that originate exclusively from layer VI of the extrastriate cortex (Kawamura and Diamond, 1978;Chomsung et al, 2010).…”
“…Lyon et al (2003b) subsequently used retrograde tracing techniques to uncover pathways from PO to temporal cortical areas TP and TPI, from PC to temporal cortical area TD and from PP to temporal cortical areas TA, TI and TAL. Most recently, Chomsung et al (2010) used anterograde tracing techniques to establish that projections from the PO and PC define two areas within the temporal cortex ventrorostral to the V2 border, one caudal and one rostral. That study did not differentiate the architectonic temporal lobe areas along that border.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.