2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2009.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric and skew-symmetric weight functions in 2D perturbation models for semi-infinite interfacial cracks

Abstract: Piccolroaz, A; Mishuris, G; Movchan AB. Symmetric and skew-symmetric weight functions in 2D perturbation models for semi-infinite interfacial cracks. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2009, 57(9), 1657-1682In this paper we address the vector problem of a 2D half-plane interfacial crack loaded by a general asymmetric distribution of forces acting on its faces. It is shown that the general integral formula for the evaluation of stress intensity factors, as well as high-order terms, requires both sy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
126
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cracks in homogeneous elastic materials, in the two-dimensional setting the skew-symmetric loading does not contribute to stress intensity factors, whereas it becomes relevant and it must to be accounted for in three-dimensional solids (Bueckner, 1985;Meade & Keer, 1984). The situation is different when the crack is placed at the interface between two dissimilar elastic materials: even for two-dimensional problems the skew-symmetric loads generate a non-zero contribution to stress intensity factors (Bercial-Velez et al, 2005;Lazarus & Leblond, 1998;Piccolroaz et al, 2009). In particular, for Mode III interfacial cracks the stress components do not oscillate, but a non-vanishing skew-symmetric component of the weight function still has to be accounted (Piccolroaz et al, 2009(Piccolroaz et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For cracks in homogeneous elastic materials, in the two-dimensional setting the skew-symmetric loading does not contribute to stress intensity factors, whereas it becomes relevant and it must to be accounted for in three-dimensional solids (Bueckner, 1985;Meade & Keer, 1984). The situation is different when the crack is placed at the interface between two dissimilar elastic materials: even for two-dimensional problems the skew-symmetric loads generate a non-zero contribution to stress intensity factors (Bercial-Velez et al, 2005;Lazarus & Leblond, 1998;Piccolroaz et al, 2009). In particular, for Mode III interfacial cracks the stress components do not oscillate, but a non-vanishing skew-symmetric component of the weight function still has to be accounted (Piccolroaz et al, 2009(Piccolroaz et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is different when the crack is placed at the interface between two dissimilar elastic materials: even for two-dimensional problems the skew-symmetric loads generate a non-zero contribution to stress intensity factors (Bercial-Velez et al, 2005;Lazarus & Leblond, 1998;Piccolroaz et al, 2009). In particular, for Mode III interfacial cracks the stress components do not oscillate, but a non-vanishing skew-symmetric component of the weight function still has to be accounted (Piccolroaz et al, 2009(Piccolroaz et al, , 2010. In the case of isotropic media, weight functions for semi-infinite cracks can be defined as singular non-trivial solutions of the homogeneous boundary problem with zero tractions on the crack faces but unbounded elastic energy (Willis & Movchan, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reciprocity identity (3.18) then becomes 22) where the symbol denotes the convolution with respect to both x 1 and x 3 , which is defined as follows [36]: ] and U are the symmetrical and skew-symmetrical weight functions matrices defined and derived in closed form in [32], whereas the term Σ 2 stands for the traction along the x 1 -axis corresponding to the singular auxiliary displacements U. The integral equation (3.22) is the generalization to thermoelastic diffusive media of the Betti identity derived in [20,21], and it relates the physical solution u, σ 2 , θ, χ to the auxiliary singular solution U, Σ 2 .…”
Section: (C) Betti Formula and Weight Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%