2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10515-013-0122-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic PathFinder: integrating symbolic execution with model checking for Java bytecode analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
223
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
223
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also we show our approach is better than state-of-the-art constraint-based test data generator Symbolic PathFinder [21].…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also we show our approach is better than state-of-the-art constraint-based test data generator Symbolic PathFinder [21].…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We compare to Symbolic PathFinder (SPF) [21], which is the state-ofthe-art of constraint-based test data generation approaches. Consider asample Java program as below:…”
Section: Compare To Constraint-based Test Data Generation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many kinds of coverage ratio, such as method coverage ratio, branch coverage ratio, and condition coverage ratio. In this part, we use the tool Java Pathfinder [14] to analyse the code coverage ratio from the perspective of method coverage ratio and branch coverage ratio.…”
Section: Analysis Of Code Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we plan to also cope with missing input data (analogously to the tool Java Pathfinder [12] for model checking of Java bytecode). Our symbolic systems are now triples of the form (Π, Q, C), where the new element C is the so called path constraint (initialized to true).…”
Section: Fig 5 Symbolic Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%