“…According to other authors who have used the report, it is "a thorough analysis" (Morriss, 2008, p. 14) with a rating system "strongly attuned to the fine-grained details of the legislation (i.e., loopholes and exemptions) that affect the strength of the reform and in some cases even distinguish symbolic from substantive legislation" (Sharp & Haider-Markel, 2008, p. 564). As the report codifies and other authors who have used it discuss (Morriss, 2008;Sharp & Haider-Markel, 2008), there is variation in states' legislative response to the Kelo decision. Some entail only minor procedural changes (requiring more public hearings or greater public notice), creation of study committees, temporary moratoria on use of eminent domain, or payment of enhanced compensation.…”